What it is
Bill proposes unemployment benefits for regional parliament members when leaving office
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 May 2012. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco - Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill on the reform of the legislation of the general regime of Social Security.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000010· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow members of regional parliaments to receive unemployment benefits when their term ends. Currently, the law does not cover this situation.
- It would amend the consolidated text of the Social Security Law to include members of regional legislative assemblies within unemployment protection, alongside local and union officials already covered.
- It would amend Law 37/2006 to require unemployment contributions from these people and from the institutions where they serve, with the same obligations and rights as workers and employers.
- The Government could issue the rules needed to apply the law, which would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Members of the parliaments of Spain's autonomous communities: They could collect unemployment benefits when leaving office, if the bill is passed.
- Regional legislative assemblies, local corporations and foral general councils: They would be required to make unemployment contributions for these officials.
- Public administrations and unions where the positions are held: They would also be required to contribute.
Words worth knowing
- Prestación por desempleo
- Unemployment benefits: money paid by the Social Security system when you lose your job or your term of office ends.
- Cotizar
- To pay Social Security contributions that give access to benefits such as unemployment or retirement.
- Texto refundido
- Consolidated text: a single, organized version of a law that gathers all its amendments.
- Excedencia forzosa
- Forced leave: a situation where a person temporarily leaves their job but keeps the right to return to it.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced24 May 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted29 May 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
10 December 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill on the reform of the legislation of the general regime of Social Security.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 154· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 6 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 12
- Against: 35
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 102 in favour · 8 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 14 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 16 in favour |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 1 in favour · 170 against · 14 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000010
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 154
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.