Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill proposes unemployment benefits for regional parliament members when leaving office

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 May 2012. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill on the reform of the legislation of the general regime of Social Security.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000010· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would allow members of regional parliaments to receive unemployment benefits when their term ends. Currently, the law does not cover this situation.
  2. It would amend the consolidated text of the Social Security Law to include members of regional legislative assemblies within unemployment protection, alongside local and union officials already covered.
  3. It would amend Law 37/2006 to require unemployment contributions from these people and from the institutions where they serve, with the same obligations and rights as workers and employers.
  4. The Government could issue the rules needed to apply the law, which would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Members of the parliaments of Spain's autonomous communities: They could collect unemployment benefits when leaving office, if the bill is passed.
  • Regional legislative assemblies, local corporations and foral general councils: They would be required to make unemployment contributions for these officials.
  • Public administrations and unions where the positions are held: They would also be required to contribute.

Words worth knowing

Prestación por desempleo
Unemployment benefits: money paid by the Social Security system when you lose your job or your term of office ends.
Cotizar
To pay Social Security contributions that give access to benefits such as unemployment or retirement.
Texto refundido
Consolidated text: a single, organized version of a law that gathers all its amendments.
Excedencia forzosa
Forced leave: a situation where a person temporarily leaves their job but keeps the right to return to it.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced24 May 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted29 May 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 201211. 24 May 2012: Presentación22. 29 May 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 29/05/2012 hasta 01/06/201233. 29 May 2012: Calificación44. 1 June 2012: Gobierno Contestación desde 01/06/2012 hasta 07/09/201255. 7 September 2012: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/09/2012 hasta 10/12/201366. 10 December 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/12/2013 hasta 13/12/2013

10 December 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 153 yes · 170 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill on the reform of the legislation of the general regime of Social Security.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 154· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 12
  • Against: 35
  • Tie: 5
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
102 in favour · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
14 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 in favour
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 170 against · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.