Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Fund to cut and buy back highway tolls

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 May 2012. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill for the fund for homogenization, selective rescue and toll subsidies.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000009· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create a fund to limit the social costs of toll highways, with programs to even out tolls, selectively buy back sections, and subsidize frequent users.
  2. The fund would be fed by taxes paid by toll highway concession companies (corporate tax and VAT), by donations from state and regional budgets, and by resources from the concession companies themselves.
  3. The fund would be run through regional funds in the areas with tolls, and state money would be shared among regions in proportion to the tolls collected in each territory.
  4. Regions under the common regime must create their own fund before December 31 of the year the law takes effect, and within six months each regional government must decide which tolls are removed, which are reduced, and on what schedule.

Who it affects

  • Frequent toll highway users: Could benefit from toll reductions or subsidies.
  • Toll highway concession companies: Part of their taxes (corporate tax and VAT) would go to the fund.
  • Regions with toll highways: Must create their own funds and run the money in proportion to toll collections.
  • Regional governments: Have six months to decide which tolls are removed or reduced.

Words worth knowing

Concesionaria
A company the government grants the right to build and operate a toll highway for a period, in exchange for charging drivers.
Rescate selectivo
The government paying the concession company to take over the operation of only some highway sections.
Comunidades de régimen común
Spanish regions that do not have a special financing system, such as the economic agreement of the Basque Country or Navarre.
Impuesto de sociedades
Corporate tax, paid by companies on their profits.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced18 May 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted29 May 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2012Sept 2012Dec 2012Mar 2013Jun 2013Sept 201311. 18 May 2012: Presentación22. 29 May 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 29/05/2012 hasta 01/06/201233. 29 May 2012: Calificación44. 1 June 2012: Gobierno Contestación desde 01/06/2012 hasta 07/09/201255. 7 September 2012: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/09/2012 hasta 08/10/201366. 8 October 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 08/10/2013 hasta 11/10/2013

8 October 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 133 yes · 178 no

Voted on: Private member's bill for the fund for homogenization, selective rescue and toll subsidies.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 134· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 8
  • Against: 35
  • Tie: 9
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
100 in favour · 10 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
9 in favour · 2 against · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
11 in favour · 5 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
171 against · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.