What it is
Fund to cut and buy back highway tolls
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 May 2012. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña - Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill for the fund for homogenization, selective rescue and toll subsidies.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000009· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create a fund to limit the social costs of toll highways, with programs to even out tolls, selectively buy back sections, and subsidize frequent users.
- The fund would be fed by taxes paid by toll highway concession companies (corporate tax and VAT), by donations from state and regional budgets, and by resources from the concession companies themselves.
- The fund would be run through regional funds in the areas with tolls, and state money would be shared among regions in proportion to the tolls collected in each territory.
- Regions under the common regime must create their own fund before December 31 of the year the law takes effect, and within six months each regional government must decide which tolls are removed, which are reduced, and on what schedule.
Who it affects
- Frequent toll highway users: Could benefit from toll reductions or subsidies.
- Toll highway concession companies: Part of their taxes (corporate tax and VAT) would go to the fund.
- Regions with toll highways: Must create their own funds and run the money in proportion to toll collections.
- Regional governments: Have six months to decide which tolls are removed or reduced.
Words worth knowing
- Concesionaria
- A company the government grants the right to build and operate a toll highway for a period, in exchange for charging drivers.
- Rescate selectivo
- The government paying the concession company to take over the operation of only some highway sections.
- Comunidades de régimen común
- Spanish regions that do not have a special financing system, such as the economic agreement of the Basque Country or Navarre.
- Impuesto de sociedades
- Corporate tax, paid by companies on their profits.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced18 May 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted29 May 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
8 October 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill for the fund for homogenization, selective rescue and toll subsidies.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 134· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 11 yes · 20 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 8
- Against: 35
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 100 in favour · 10 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 2 against · 7 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 11 in favour · 5 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 171 against · 14 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- VII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected· nearly the same title Proposición de Ley de creación del Fondo para la homogeneización, el rescate selectivo y la subvención de peajes
- VIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposición de Ley del fondo para la homogeneización, el rescate selectivo y la subvención de peajes
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000009
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 134
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.