Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would hand Andalusia the management of Guadalquivir waters

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 28 December 2011. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía-Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's organic bill on the delegation of powers regarding the waters of the Guadalquivir basin that flow entirely through Andalusian territory to the Autonomous Community of Andalusia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000008· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill is an organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. that would delegate to Andalusia exclusive State powers over the waters of the Guadalquivir basin that flow entirely through Andalusian territory and do not affect another autonomous community.
  2. Andalusia would exercise, by delegation, functions such as granting water resources, managing the Water Registry, authorizing discharges, sanctioning water offenses, and running the hydrological information systems.
  3. The State would keep key functions: regulatory rules, the Basin Hydrological Plan, works of general interest, certain reservoirs such as Fresneda and Montoro, and the chairing of the basin's bodies.
  4. Both administrations would have to coordinate: share information and statistics, create water rights exchange centers, and agree on the release regime for the reservoirs each one manages.
  5. The State could issue instructions and, if Andalusia failed to comply, formally require it to comply and, after a Council of State opinion, report to the Cortes Generales, which would decide whether to keep or revoke the delegation. The delegation would last indefinitely.
  6. Andalusia would cover all costs and revenues from the delegated functions, and a joint commission would agree on the transfer of resources, after hearing Castilla-La Mancha, Murcia and Extremadura.

Who it affects

  • Andalusia and its regional government: Would receive, by delegation, the executive management of Guadalquivir waters flowing only through its territory.
  • People seeking water permits or discharge authorizations in that area: Would deal with the Andalusian administration instead of the State administration.
  • The State and the Guadalquivir Basin Authority: Would keep planning, rules and works of general interest, plus oversight of the delegation.
  • Castilla-La Mancha, Murcia and Extremadura: Would be heard before final agreements on the transfer of resources, since part of their territory is in the basin.

Words worth knowing

Ley orgánica (organic law)
A type of Spanish law reserved for major matters, requiring stronger majorities in Congress to pass.
Delegación de competencias (delegation of powers)
The State lets another administration exercise functions that belong to it, while keeping certain controls.
Cuenca hidrográfica (river basin)
The territory drained by a single river and its tributaries.
Concesión de recursos hídricos (water concession)
An administrative permit to use water from a river or reservoir.
Confederación Hidrográfica (basin authority)
A public body that manages the waters of a basin on behalf of the State.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced28 December 2011Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted11 January 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2011Mar 2012Jun 2012Sept 2012Dec 2012Mar 201311. 28 December 2011: Presentación22. 11 January 2012: Mesa del Congreso Requerimiento de antecedentes desde 11/01/2012 hasta 24/01/201233. 11 January 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 11/01/2012 hasta 13/01/201244. 11 January 2012: Calificación55. 13 January 2012: Gobierno Contestación desde 13/01/2012 hasta 07/03/201266. 7 March 2012: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/03/2012 hasta 11/06/201377. 11 June 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 11/06/2013 hasta 14/06/2013

11 June 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 142 yes · 185 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's organic bill on the delegation of powers regarding the waters of the Guadalquivir basin that flow entirely through Andalusian territory to the Autonomous Community of Andalusia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 112· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 8
  • Against: 37
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
103 in favour · 7 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
9 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. · 6 did not vote
GC-CiU16
15 in favour · 1 did not vote
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
178 against · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.