What it is
Proposal to protect homes in Galicia's traditional coastal settlements
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 December 2011. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia - Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 22/1988, of July 28, on the Coast (corresponding to file number 125/000026/0000 of the IX Legislature).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000005· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend the 1988 Coastal Law so that people who own land or buildings in the maritime-terrestrial zone, previously declared private property by a final court ruling, registered as such, or backed by public administrative acts, could request a 30-year concession, renewable for another 30 years, with no fee. If the State takes back those assets, it would have to take on existing mortgages and charges, or hand over a similar asset in the same municipality or pay compensation at market price within a two-kilometer radius.
- In Galicia, on land that was urban when the Coastal Law came into force, new uses and buildings could be authorized under current planning rules, under conditions. Land would count as urban if it was classified as such, if it met all the requirements to be classified (road access, water supply, drainage, electricity, and buildings covering two thirds of its area), and traditional rural settlements, whether formally declared or not.
- The bill would expand which works count as repair and improvement for buildings in the protection easement zone: conservation, consolidation, restoration, interior remodeling and recovery, without changing the building's volume or original configuration. Works to restore buildings destroyed by natural disasters or proven force majeure would also be included.
- Urban settlements consolidated before the law came into force and created under public administrative acts could be excluded from the maritime-terrestrial public domain by administrative decision, with a prior report from the affected city council or regional government, without the declassification process in Articles 17, 18 and 19 of the Law.
Who it affects
- Owners of homes and land on the Galician coast affected by Coastal Law boundary determinations.: They could request an occupation concession with no fee and, if the State takes back the asset, require it to assume mortgages or give them another asset or compensation.
- Residents of traditional rural settlements on the Galician coast.: Their settlements could be treated as urban land, allowing new uses and buildings.
- Owners of legal buildings within the protection easement zone.: They could carry out more types of repair and improvement works, and rebuild after disasters.
- City councils and the Xunta de Galicia (Galicia's regional government).: They would issue a prior report to exclude consolidated urban settlements from the public domain.
Words worth knowing
- Dominio público marítimo-terrestre
- The maritime-terrestrial public domain: the coastal zone (beaches, shores and sea) that is for public use and belongs to the State.
- Deslinde
- Boundary determination: the process by which the Administration marks the exact limits of the public coastal zone.
- Servidumbre de protección
- Protection easement: a strip of land next to the public coastal zone where only certain limited works and uses are allowed.
- Concesión
- Concession: authorization to use a public asset for a set period of time, without owning it.
- Canon
- Fee: a periodic payment made for using a public asset.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced13 December 2011Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted21 December 2011The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
7 May 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill amending Law 22/1988, of July 28, on the Coast (corresponding to file number 125/000026/0000 of the IX Legislature).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 103· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 12 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 0 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 19 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ceuta No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 0 yes · 30 no
- Málaga More votes against 0 yes · 10 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 10 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 0 yes · 10 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 0 yes · 16 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, GIP, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 49, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 49
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 106 against · 4 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 3 in favour · 10 against · 1 abst. · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 against · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 173 against · 1 abst. · 11 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000005
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 103
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.