Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to enforce Constitutional Court rulings in Spain

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 September 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court, for the enforcement of Constitutional Court rulings as a guarantee of the Rule of Law.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000213· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would give the Constitutional Court more tools to make sure its rulings are actually enforced, since it considers that effectiveness essential to the rule of law.
  2. The bill would make the Court's rulings enforceable titles, would require courts to provide judicial assistance to the Court on a priority and urgent basis, and would allow personal notification of its rulings to any public authority or employee.
  3. If the Court finds non-compliance, it could impose fines of 3,000 to 30,000 euros (repeatable until full compliance), suspend the responsible public authorities or employees from office, entrust enforcement to the Government of the Nation, or refer the case for criminal liability.
  4. In cases of special constitutional significance, the Court could take enforcement measures without first hearing the parties, though it would then hear them for three days. The fine amounts could be revised by ordinary law, and the law would take effect the day it is published in the official state gazette (BOE).

Who it affects

  • All public authorities: Must comply with what the Court rules and may receive personal notifications of its rulings.
  • Public authorities and employees: May face fines or suspension from office for failing to comply with the Court's rulings.
  • Private individuals: May be fined and held criminally liable for failing to comply with the Court's rulings.
  • Courts: Must provide judicial assistance to the Court on a priority and urgent basis.
  • Government of the Nation: May be asked to enforce the Court's rulings on its behalf.

Words worth knowing

Título ejecutivo (enforceable title)
A document that allows you to ask the courts to enforce what it orders, like an enforceable order.
Auxilio jurisdiccional (judicial assistance)
Help that other courts provide to a judicial body so it can carry out its actions.
Multa coercitiva (coercive fine)
A fine that can be repeated until the person required to comply actually does so.
Ejecución sustitutoria (substitute enforcement)
When another branch of government (here, the Government) does what is needed to comply with a ruling because the party required to do so has not.
Inaudita parte (without hearing the parties)
Taking a measure without first hearing the people affected.

It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced1 September 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted1 September 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments16 September 2015Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary24 September 2015All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate1 October 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE15 October 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2015Sept 2015Sept 2015Sept 2015Oct 2015Oct 201511. 1 September 2015: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 01/09/2015 hasta 04/09/201522. 1 September 2015: Presentación33. 1 September 2015: Calificación44. 1 September 2015: Mesa del Congreso Calificación por el Presidente desde 01/09/2015 hasta 01/09/201555. 4 September 2015: Gobierno Contestación desde 04/09/2015 hasta 04/09/201566. 4 September 2015: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 04/09/2015 hasta 16/09/201577. 16 September 2015: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 16/09/2015 hasta 16/09/201588. 16 September 2015: Pleno Enmiendas desde 16/09/2015 hasta 24/09/201599. 24 September 2015: Pleno Aprobación desde 24/09/2015 hasta 01/10/20151010. 1 October 2015: Senado desde 01/10/2015 hasta 15/10/20151111. 15 October 2015: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 15/10/2015 hasta 10/11/2015

1 October 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 181 yes · 133 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill for the Organic Law reform of Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, of the Constitutional Court, for the execution of the resolutions of the Constitutional Court as a guarantee of the Rule of Law, to be processed in a single reading and having an organic character.

This law had 21 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 19 of sitting 289· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 39 most voted in favour; in 9, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 39
  • Against: 9
  • Tie: 4
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista108
95 against · 13 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
1 in favour · 11 against · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote
GC-CiU16
10 against · 6 did not vote
GIP11
7 against · 4 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
180 in favour · 1 against · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.