What it is
Proposal to enforce Constitutional Court rulings in Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 September 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court, for the enforcement of Constitutional Court rulings as a guarantee of the Rule of Law.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000213· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would give the Constitutional Court more tools to make sure its rulings are actually enforced, since it considers that effectiveness essential to the rule of law.
- The bill would make the Court's rulings enforceable titles, would require courts to provide judicial assistance to the Court on a priority and urgent basis, and would allow personal notification of its rulings to any public authority or employee.
- If the Court finds non-compliance, it could impose fines of 3,000 to 30,000 euros (repeatable until full compliance), suspend the responsible public authorities or employees from office, entrust enforcement to the Government of the Nation, or refer the case for criminal liability.
- In cases of special constitutional significance, the Court could take enforcement measures without first hearing the parties, though it would then hear them for three days. The fine amounts could be revised by ordinary law, and the law would take effect the day it is published in the official state gazette (BOE).
Who it affects
- All public authorities: Must comply with what the Court rules and may receive personal notifications of its rulings.
- Public authorities and employees: May face fines or suspension from office for failing to comply with the Court's rulings.
- Private individuals: May be fined and held criminally liable for failing to comply with the Court's rulings.
- Courts: Must provide judicial assistance to the Court on a priority and urgent basis.
- Government of the Nation: May be asked to enforce the Court's rulings on its behalf.
Words worth knowing
- Título ejecutivo (enforceable title)
- A document that allows you to ask the courts to enforce what it orders, like an enforceable order.
- Auxilio jurisdiccional (judicial assistance)
- Help that other courts provide to a judicial body so it can carry out its actions.
- Multa coercitiva (coercive fine)
- A fine that can be repeated until the person required to comply actually does so.
- Ejecución sustitutoria (substitute enforcement)
- When another branch of government (here, the Government) does what is needed to comply with a ruling because the party required to do so has not.
- Inaudita parte (without hearing the parties)
- Taking a measure without first hearing the people affected.
It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced1 September 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted1 September 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments16 September 2015Groups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary24 September 2015All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate1 October 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE15 October 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
1 October 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill for the Organic Law reform of Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, of the Constitutional Court, for the execution of the resolutions of the Constitutional Court as a guarantee of the Rule of Law, to be processed in a single reading and having an organic character.
This law had 21 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 19 of sitting 289· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 16 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 18 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla Tie 5 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 39 most voted in favour; in 9, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 39
- Against: 9
- Tie: 4
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 108 | 95 against · 13 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 11 against · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 10 against · 6 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 7 against · 4 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 180 in favour · 1 against · 4 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000213
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 19 of sitting 289
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.