What it is
Proposal to give everyone the right to public health care
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 12 June 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill on the universalization of the right to public healthcare.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000206· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would make all Spaniards and all foreigners registered in Spain holders of the right to health protection and health care, and would delete the articles that restricted that right.
- It would amend the immigration law so that foreigners registered in their municipality's census would get health care on the same terms as Spaniards. It also covers specific rights: emergency care, people under eighteen, and pregnant women during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period.
- It would extend access to public health care to all Spaniards living in Spain who could not have that right recognized under other rules, regardless of their income level. It would also extend benefits to self-employed people in the terms provided, and would keep the special regime of certain civil servant mutual funds.
- The Government would have two months to approve the rules needed to implement the law, and the law would take effect the same day it is published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Spaniards living in Spain who currently do not have the right to public health care recognized: They would have access to public health care on the same terms as everyone else, regardless of income.
- Foreigners registered in the municipal census in Spain: They would have the right to health care on the same terms as Spaniards.
- Foreigners not registered in the census: They would keep emergency care for serious illness or accident until medical discharge.
- Foreign children under eighteen and foreign pregnant women: They would have the right to health care on the same terms as Spaniards.
- People covered by civil servant mutual funds (Mutualidad de Funcionarios Civiles del Estado, Mutualidad General Judicial or Instituto Social de las Fuerzas Armadas): They would keep their specific legal regime unchanged.
Words worth knowing
- Proposición de ley
- A text through which a parliamentary group proposes a new law. It is not an approved law until the whole process is complete.
- Empadronamiento
- Registering with the local registry (padrón) of the municipality where you live.
- Real Decreto-ley 16/2012
- A 2012 rule that restricted access to public health care and that this bill would reverse.
- Asegurado
- A person who, under Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, has the right to public health care because of their relationship with Social Security.
- Alta médica
- Medical discharge, when a doctor ends treatment because the patient no longer needs care.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced12 June 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted16 June 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
29 September 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the universalization of the right to public health assistance.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 287· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 6 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD and Sin grupo. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 35
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 108 | 100 in favour · 8 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 3 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 12 in favour · 6 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 15 | 12 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 167 against · 18 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XI Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished· nearly the same title Bill to give everyone the right to public healthcare
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished· nearly the same title Bill to give everyone access to public health care
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000206
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 287
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.