Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to give everyone the right to public health care

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 12 June 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill on the universalization of the right to public healthcare.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000206· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would make all Spaniards and all foreigners registered in Spain holders of the right to health protection and health care, and would delete the articles that restricted that right.
  2. It would amend the immigration law so that foreigners registered in their municipality's census would get health care on the same terms as Spaniards. It also covers specific rights: emergency care, people under eighteen, and pregnant women during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period.
  3. It would extend access to public health care to all Spaniards living in Spain who could not have that right recognized under other rules, regardless of their income level. It would also extend benefits to self-employed people in the terms provided, and would keep the special regime of certain civil servant mutual funds.
  4. The Government would have two months to approve the rules needed to implement the law, and the law would take effect the same day it is published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Spaniards living in Spain who currently do not have the right to public health care recognized: They would have access to public health care on the same terms as everyone else, regardless of income.
  • Foreigners registered in the municipal census in Spain: They would have the right to health care on the same terms as Spaniards.
  • Foreigners not registered in the census: They would keep emergency care for serious illness or accident until medical discharge.
  • Foreign children under eighteen and foreign pregnant women: They would have the right to health care on the same terms as Spaniards.
  • People covered by civil servant mutual funds (Mutualidad de Funcionarios Civiles del Estado, Mutualidad General Judicial or Instituto Social de las Fuerzas Armadas): They would keep their specific legal regime unchanged.

Words worth knowing

Proposición de ley
A text through which a parliamentary group proposes a new law. It is not an approved law until the whole process is complete.
Empadronamiento
Registering with the local registry (padrón) of the municipality where you live.
Real Decreto-ley 16/2012
A 2012 rule that restricted access to public health care and that this bill would reverse.
Asegurado
A person who, under Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, has the right to public health care because of their relationship with Social Security.
Alta médica
Medical discharge, when a doctor ends treatment because the patient no longer needs care.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced12 June 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 June 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2015Jul 2015Aug 201511. 12 June 2015: Presentación22. 16 June 2015: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 16/06/2015 hasta 19/06/201533. 16 June 2015: Calificación44. 19 June 2015: Gobierno Contestación desde 19/06/2015 hasta 24/09/201555. 24 September 2015: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 24/09/2015 hasta 29/09/201566. 29 September 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 29/09/2015 hasta 05/10/2015

29 September 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 142 yes · 167 no

Voted on: Private member's bill of the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the universalization of the right to public health assistance.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 287· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD and Sin grupo. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 35
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista108
100 in favour · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
3 in favour · 2 did not vote
Mixto18
12 in favour · 6 did not vote
GC-CiU15
12 in favour · 3 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Sin grupo1
1 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
167 against · 18 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.