What it is
Girls aged 16 and 17 now need parental consent for abortion
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 February 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law to strengthen the protection of minors and women with judicially modified capacity in voluntary interruption of pregnancy.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000195· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The rule that let 16- and 17-year-old girls consent on their own to a voluntary abortion is removed. Now, in addition to their own will, the express consent of those holding parental authority or guardianship is required.
- If the legal representatives disagree when giving consent, or if their decision could harm the best interests of the minor, the matter is resolved under the Civil Code.
- The law applies throughout the territory of the State, without prejudice to the powers of the autonomous communities, and takes effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Girls aged 16 and 17: They can no longer decide on their own to have a voluntary abortion; they need the express consent of their legal representatives.
- Parents and guardians: They must give express consent for the abortion of minors in their care.
- People with court-modified capacity: They also need the consent of their legal representatives for this procedure.
Words worth knowing
- Patria potestad
- The set of duties and powers parents have over their minor children, such as caring for, educating and representing them.
- Tutela
- A figure similar to parental authority, but exercised by a guardian over people who cannot look after themselves, such as minors without parents.
- Ley orgánica
- An organic law, reserved for major matters such as fundamental rights, which requires a special vote in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) to pass.
- Interrupción voluntaria del embarazo
- The official Spanish name for abortion.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced18 February 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted24 February 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments24 April 2015Groups propose changes.
- Committee9 June 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary7 July 2015All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate16 July 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE9 September 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 15 official steps on a timeline
16 July 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Joint vote on the Organic bill to strengthen the protection of minors and women with judicially modified capacity in voluntary interruption of pregnancy, as it has an organic character.
This law had 16 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 41 of sitting 280· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 9 yes · 17 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Girona Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 16 no · 1 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 13 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 38 most voted in favour; in 8, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 38
- Against: 8
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 109 | 1 in favour · 99 against · 9 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 1 in favour · 10 against · 1 abst. · 7 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 6 in favour · 8 against · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 against · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 178 in favour · 1 against · 3 abst. · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Private member's bill for an Organic Law to strengthen the protection of minors and women with judicially modified capacity in voluntary interruption of pregnancy.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 11/2015, of September 21, to reinforce the protection of minors and women with judicially modified capacity in voluntary pregnancy termination.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000195
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 41 of sitting 280
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2015-10141
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.