What it is
Bill to make public healthcare free for everyone in Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 February 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill on the universalization of the right to public health assistance, restoring the legal situation prior to the promulgation of Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, of 20 April, on urgent measures to guarantee the sustainability of the National Health System and improve the quality and safety of its services.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000191· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would make public healthcare free for all people with Spanish nationality and for foreigners living in Spain, without depending on Social Security. Payment would remain only for those who choose a mutual society covering healthcare and for certain civil servants in mutual societies until they join the National Health System.
- It would amend the General Health Law so that its goal is universal healthcare for the whole population, and change the Cohesion Law so that the right belongs to all Spaniards and all foreigners in Spain, including people without a residence permit who actually live in Spain.
- Foreigners registered with their municipality or actually living in Spain would have the right to healthcare on equal terms with Spaniards, provided no third party is obliged to pay.
- The Government would have six months to produce a report on integrating mutual societies into the National Health System. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- People with no link to Social Security, who would regain free public healthcare coverage.: Free access to public healthcare.
- Foreigners without a residence permit who are registered with a municipality or actually live in Spain.: Right to healthcare on equal terms.
- Spaniards who used up unemployment benefits and left the country for more than ninety days to look for work or training.: They would regain healthcare coverage.
- People covered by mutual societies and civil servants in them.: They would not get automatic free care until integration into the National Health System.
Words worth knowing
- Real Decreto-ley
- Royal decree-law: a rule with the force of law that the Government can pass urgently, without full parliamentary procedure.
- Sistema Nacional de Salud
- National Health System: Spain's network of public health services, run by the State and the regions.
- Mutualidad
- Mutual society: an alternative health coverage system, typical of some civil servants, separate from Social Security.
- Residencia de hecho
- De facto residence: actually living somewhere without an official record or permit proving it.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill: a text proposed by members of Congress to become law; it is not yet approved.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced4 February 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted10 February 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
26 May 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliamentary Group of IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: The Plural Left, on the universalization of the right to public healthcare, restoring the legal situation prior to the promulgation of Royal Decree-Law 16/2012, of 20 April, on urgent measures to guarantee the sustainability of the National Health System and improve the quality and safety of its services.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 265· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 17 yes · 4 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 14 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 36, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 9
- Against: 36
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 99 in favour · 11 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 14 in favour · 1 against · 3 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 11 in favour · 5 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 4 | 4 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 1 in favour · 170 against · 14 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000191
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 265
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.