Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to standardize and publish pay for public officials

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 January 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Official title: Private member's bill on transparency and rationalization of the remuneration system of the members of the Government, of the Senior Officials of the General State Administration (AGE) and the remaining elected public officials (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000188· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would organize the pay of Government members, senior officials of the State Administration and other public officials into pay groups, with a maximum salary per group that cannot exceed the next group up. It would also ban hidden or disguised pay.
  2. Salaries would always include a fixed part and, where possible, a variable part tied to goals, subject to a performance review with transparent and objective criteria.
  3. Attendance allowances for meetings, councils and plenary sessions could only be paid if the official does not work on an exclusive basis, though expenses from holding the office could be reimbursed.
  4. The bill assigns a pay group to each position: the Prime Minister in Group 1, deputy prime ministers in Group 2, ministers in Group 3, Secretaries of State in Group 4, and so on down to government subdelegates in Group 8.
  5. It also sets pay groups for local elected officials, the judiciary, the Constitutional Court, other constitutional bodies such as the Council of State or the Bank of Spain, and managers of public bodies and companies, with maximum limits depending on the position.
  6. The electoral law would be amended to prevent holding a seat in Congress or the Senate at the same time as being a city councilor or regional parliament member, and to ban being paid by a party for internal party roles. The General Directorate of Public Function would oversee compliance, and within six months the Government would report on including the Crown and the Cortes under the law.

Who it affects

  • Government members and senior officials of the State Administration: Their salaries would be set by pay groups and hidden pay would be banned.
  • Local elected officials, such as provincial deputies and local council members: They would be assigned a pay group based on their population size, with presidents in a higher group.
  • Staff of the judiciary, the Constitutional Court and other constitutional bodies: They would be assigned a fixed pay group based on their position.
  • Managers and board members of public bodies and public sector companies: Their pay would have maximum limits depending on the role.
  • Members of Congress and the Senate: They could not hold a city council seat at the same time nor be paid by their party for internal roles.

Words worth knowing

Alto Cargo de la Administración General del Estado (AGE)
A person holding a senior management position in the State Administration, such as a Secretary of State or Director General.
Grupo retributivo
Pay group: a category grouping positions with similar salary levels within a maximum range.
Sobresueldo
Extra money a public official receives on top of their official salary, for example from their political party.
LOREG
Ley Orgánica del Régimen Electoral General, the Spanish law governing elections and the term of members of Congress and the Senate.
Dedicación absoluta
Full-time dedication: the duty to devote oneself exclusively to the public office, without being paid for other work.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced29 January 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted4 February 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2015Feb 2015Feb 2015Feb 2015Feb 2015Mar 201511. 29 January 2015: Presentación22. 4 February 2015: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 04/02/2015 hasta 06/02/201533. 4 February 2015: Calificación44. 6 February 2015: Gobierno Contestación desde 06/02/2015 hasta 02/03/201555. 2 March 2015: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 02/03/2015 hasta 10/03/201566. 10 March 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/03/2015 hasta 13/03/2015

10 March 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 134 yes · 169 no · 5 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill of the Union, Progress and Democracy Parliamentary Group, Organic on transparency and rationalization of the remuneration system of the members of the Government, of the Senior Officials of the General State Administration (AGE) and the remaining elected public officials (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 248· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 7
  • Against: 35
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 9
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
97 in favour · 13 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto18
10 in favour · 2 against · 6 did not vote
GC-CiU16
12 in favour · 4 did not vote
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 167 against · 17 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.