What it is
Proposal to standardize and publish pay for public officials
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 January 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.
Official title: Private member's bill on transparency and rationalization of the remuneration system of the members of the Government, of the Senior Officials of the General State Administration (AGE) and the remaining elected public officials (Organic).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000188· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would organize the pay of Government members, senior officials of the State Administration and other public officials into pay groups, with a maximum salary per group that cannot exceed the next group up. It would also ban hidden or disguised pay.
- Salaries would always include a fixed part and, where possible, a variable part tied to goals, subject to a performance review with transparent and objective criteria.
- Attendance allowances for meetings, councils and plenary sessions could only be paid if the official does not work on an exclusive basis, though expenses from holding the office could be reimbursed.
- The bill assigns a pay group to each position: the Prime Minister in Group 1, deputy prime ministers in Group 2, ministers in Group 3, Secretaries of State in Group 4, and so on down to government subdelegates in Group 8.
- It also sets pay groups for local elected officials, the judiciary, the Constitutional Court, other constitutional bodies such as the Council of State or the Bank of Spain, and managers of public bodies and companies, with maximum limits depending on the position.
- The electoral law would be amended to prevent holding a seat in Congress or the Senate at the same time as being a city councilor or regional parliament member, and to ban being paid by a party for internal party roles. The General Directorate of Public Function would oversee compliance, and within six months the Government would report on including the Crown and the Cortes under the law.
Who it affects
- Government members and senior officials of the State Administration: Their salaries would be set by pay groups and hidden pay would be banned.
- Local elected officials, such as provincial deputies and local council members: They would be assigned a pay group based on their population size, with presidents in a higher group.
- Staff of the judiciary, the Constitutional Court and other constitutional bodies: They would be assigned a fixed pay group based on their position.
- Managers and board members of public bodies and public sector companies: Their pay would have maximum limits depending on the role.
- Members of Congress and the Senate: They could not hold a city council seat at the same time nor be paid by their party for internal roles.
Words worth knowing
- Alto Cargo de la Administración General del Estado (AGE)
- A person holding a senior management position in the State Administration, such as a Secretary of State or Director General.
- Grupo retributivo
- Pay group: a category grouping positions with similar salary levels within a maximum range.
- Sobresueldo
- Extra money a public official receives on top of their official salary, for example from their political party.
- LOREG
- Ley Orgánica del Régimen Electoral General, the Spanish law governing elections and the term of members of Congress and the Senate.
- Dedicación absoluta
- Full-time dedication: the duty to devote oneself exclusively to the public office, without being paid for other work.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced29 January 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 February 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
10 March 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Union, Progress and Democracy Parliamentary Group, Organic on transparency and rationalization of the remuneration system of the members of the Government, of the Senior Officials of the General State Administration (AGE) and the remaining elected public officials (Organic).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 248· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 14 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 7
- Against: 35
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 97 in favour · 13 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Mixto | 18 | 10 in favour · 2 against · 6 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 12 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 1 in favour · 167 against · 17 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000188
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 248
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.