Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to transfer the AP-9 highway to Galicia

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 7 January 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Official title: Organic Private member's bill on the transfer of ownership and competences of the AP-9 to the Autonomous Community of Galicia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000183· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would transfer ownership of the AP-9 highway to the Autonomous Community of Galicia, along with powers over its concession and the functions and services currently handled by the State Administration. Galicia would authorize new sections, inspect the highway, sanction the concessionaire, and decide on tariffs, tolls and discounts.
  2. The transfer of services would only take effect once Galicia receives the necessary material and budgetary resources, through an agreement by the Joint Transfer Commission State-Xunta de Galicia and a Royal Decree. The bill sets a maximum of six months from its entry into force to complete the transfer.
  3. Once the transfer is done, the Government would remove the AP-9 from the State Road Network by Royal Decree. If Galicia decided to buy back the concession to return the highway to public hands, the State would assume the corresponding financial obligations.
  4. The transfer would not change the functions reserved to the State regarding border control, and the law would enter into force the day after its publication in the BOE (official state gazette).

Who it affects

  • Drivers and users of the AP-9: The Xunta de Galicia would decide on tolls, tariffs and discounts for the highway.
  • The AP-9 concessionaire company: It would be supervised and inspected by Galicia, which would also hold sanctioning powers.
  • The General State Administration: It would lose ownership and management of the AP-9, but would keep the financial obligations from the current concession and border control.
  • The Xunta de Galicia: It would receive the functions, services and resources needed to manage the highway.

Words worth knowing

Concesión (concession)
A contract under which the State hires a private company to build or run a public work, such as a toll highway, in exchange for charging for its use.
Rescate de la concesión (buyback of the concession)
A decision by the administration to end the contract with the concessionaire early and take the service back into public management.
Traspaso de servicios (transfer of services)
The process by which one administration hands over to another the resources, staff and funding needed to exercise a transferred power.
Proposición de Ley Orgánica (Organic Bill)
A text introduced by members of Congress to pass an organic law. It is not a law in force until it goes through the legislative process and is approved.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced7 January 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 January 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2015Feb 2015Mar 2015Apr 201511. 7 January 2015: Presentación22. 13 January 2015: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 13/01/2015 hasta 16/01/201533. 13 January 2015: Calificación44. 16 January 2015: Gobierno Contestación desde 16/01/2015 hasta 09/03/201555. 9 March 2015: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 09/03/2015 hasta 26/05/201566. 26 May 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 26/05/2015 hasta 29/05/2015

26 May 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 42 yes · 172 no · 99 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Mixed Parliamentary Group, Organic bill on the transfer of ownership and competences of the AP-9 to the Autonomous Community of Galicia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 265· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 6
  • Against: 37
  • Abstained: 3
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
1 against · 98 abst. · 11 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
14 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
11 in favour · 5 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD4
4 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
171 against · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.