What it is
Proposal to update the rule governing Navarra's Economic Agreement
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 December 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Official title: Private member's bill amending the second additional provision of Organic Law 8/1980, of 22 September, on the financing of the Autonomous Communities (Organic).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000178· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by the Mixed Parliamentary Group, would amend the second additional provision of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on regional financing, unchanged since 1980.
- The new wording would state that the financial and tax activity of the Foral Community of Navarra is governed by the Economic Agreement, under Article 45 of the LORAFNA 1982 law recognizing and improving Navarra's foral system., and that its own non-agreed taxes would be governed only by Article 2.2 of that Agreement.
- The explanatory statement notes that in 1980 Navarra was not an autonomous community, so the law referred to Navarra as a territory, not as a Foral Community, a status it gained in 1982.
Who it affects
- The Foral Community of Navarra, whose financial and tax system is the subject of the bill.: Its Economic Agreement would be expressly cited as the rule governing its financial and tax activity.
- The State and the other autonomous communities: It would be made clear that Navarra's own non-agreed taxes are governed only by the Economic Agreement.
Words worth knowing
- Convenio Económico (Economic Agreement)
- Agreement setting how Navarra collects its taxes and how much it contributes to the State.
- LORAFNA
- 1982 law recognizing and improving Navarra's foral system.
- Bloque de constitucionalidad (block of constitutionality)
- Set of rules used to judge whether a law is constitutional.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced1 December 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 December 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
24 March 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Organic Private member's bill of the Mixed Parliamentary Group amending the second additional provision of Organic Law 8/1980, of 22 September, on the financing of the Autonomous Communities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 251· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 23 yes · 3 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes against 11 yes · 20 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 10 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 32, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 32
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 96 in favour · 14 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 15 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 155 against · 30 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000178
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 251
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.