Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to update the rule governing Navarra's Economic Agreement

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 December 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Official title: Private member's bill amending the second additional provision of Organic Law 8/1980, of 22 September, on the financing of the Autonomous Communities (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000178· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the Mixed Parliamentary Group, would amend the second additional provision of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on regional financing, unchanged since 1980.
  2. The new wording would state that the financial and tax activity of the Foral Community of Navarra is governed by the Economic Agreement, under Article 45 of the LORAFNA 1982 law recognizing and improving Navarra's foral system., and that its own non-agreed taxes would be governed only by Article 2.2 of that Agreement.
  3. The explanatory statement notes that in 1980 Navarra was not an autonomous community, so the law referred to Navarra as a territory, not as a Foral Community, a status it gained in 1982.

Who it affects

  • The Foral Community of Navarra, whose financial and tax system is the subject of the bill.: Its Economic Agreement would be expressly cited as the rule governing its financial and tax activity.
  • The State and the other autonomous communities: It would be made clear that Navarra's own non-agreed taxes are governed only by the Economic Agreement.

Words worth knowing

Convenio Económico (Economic Agreement)
Agreement setting how Navarra collects its taxes and how much it contributes to the State.
LORAFNA
1982 law recognizing and improving Navarra's foral system.
Bloque de constitucionalidad (block of constitutionality)
Set of rules used to judge whether a law is constitutional.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced1 December 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 December 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2014Jan 2015Feb 201511. 1 December 2014: Presentación22. 3 December 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 03/12/2014 hasta 05/12/201433. 3 December 2014: Calificación44. 5 December 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 05/12/2014 hasta 17/02/201555. 17 February 2015: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/02/2015 hasta 24/03/201566. 24 March 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 24/03/2015 hasta 27/03/2015

24 March 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 139 yes · 161 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Organic Private member's bill of the Mixed Parliamentary Group amending the second additional provision of Organic Law 8/1980, of 22 September, on the financing of the Autonomous Communities.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 251· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 32, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 32
  • Tie: 9
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
96 in favour · 14 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
15 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
GC-CiU16
13 in favour · 3 did not vote
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
155 against · 30 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.