Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to distribute Congress seats more proportionally

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 10 September 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Official title: Private member's bill regarding the reform of Organic Law 5/1985, of June 19, on the General Electoral Regime, to guarantee greater proportionality (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000170· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill proposes changing how Congress seats are distributed. Each province would get an initial minimum of just one seat instead of two, and the remaining 298 seats would be distributed in proportion to population using the Sainte-Laguë method.
  2. It would first calculate each party's total seats based on its votes nationwide, with a small threshold to exclude parties with very few votes. The last 25 seats would be allocated in a way that favors the party with the most votes, to help governability.
  3. Then each party's seats would be distributed among the provinces through a biproportional apportionment, a more complex mathematical method than the current one.
  4. The bill would replace closed, blocked party lists with open lists: voters could mark the candidates they prefer on the ballot, and seats would go first to the top of the list and then to the candidates with the most preference votes.
  5. The explanatory statement justifies the change because votes weigh more in sparsely populated provinces than in densely populated ones, and because the current system favors the most voted parties. It cites reports from the Council of State (Consejo de Estado) and the OSCE.
  6. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Voters: They could mark the candidates they prefer on the ballot, not just vote for a fixed list.
  • Small political parties: They would find it easier to win seats, though parties with very few votes would be excluded from the allocation.
  • Large political parties: The party with the most votes would still get an advantage in the last 25 seats.
  • Residents of densely populated provinces: Their provinces would no longer be underrepresented, because seats would be distributed by population.
  • Candidates: Their position on the list would no longer guarantee a seat: the preference votes they receive would count.

Words worth knowing

Método d'Hondt (D'Hondt method)
A mathematical formula used to allocate seats by votes; it favors the parties with the most votes.
Método Sainte-Laguë (Sainte-Laguë method)
Another mathematical formula for allocating seats, more proportional than D'Hondt.
Reparto biproporcional (biproportional apportionment)
A method that allocates seats in two steps: first how many go to each party and each province, then how the two allocations are combined.
Listas cerradas y bloqueadas (closed, blocked lists)
The current system: you can only vote for a party's full list, and candidates get seats in the order they appear.
Voto preferencial (preference vote)
A mark a voter makes next to a candidate's name to show they prefer that candidate.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced10 September 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 September 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2014Sept 2014Sept 2014Oct 201411. 10 September 2014: Presentación22. 16 September 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 16/09/2014 hasta 19/09/201433. 16 September 2014: Calificación44. 19 September 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 19/09/2014 hasta 29/09/201455. 29 September 2014: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 29/09/2014 hasta 07/10/201466. 7 October 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 07/10/2014 hasta 10/10/2014

7 October 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 14 yes · 296 no · 4 abst.

Voted on: By the Union, Progress and Democracy Parliamentary Group, on the reform of Organic Law 5/1985, of 19 June, of the General Electoral Regime, to guarantee greater proportionality (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 209· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 52
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
100 against · 10 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto18
1 in favour · 6 against · 4 abst. · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 against · 2 did not vote
GIP11
8 in favour · 3 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso184
171 against · 13 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.