What it is
Proposal to distribute Congress seats more proportionally
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 10 September 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.
Official title: Private member's bill regarding the reform of Organic Law 5/1985, of June 19, on the General Electoral Regime, to guarantee greater proportionality (Organic).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000170· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes changing how Congress seats are distributed. Each province would get an initial minimum of just one seat instead of two, and the remaining 298 seats would be distributed in proportion to population using the Sainte-Laguë method.
- It would first calculate each party's total seats based on its votes nationwide, with a small threshold to exclude parties with very few votes. The last 25 seats would be allocated in a way that favors the party with the most votes, to help governability.
- Then each party's seats would be distributed among the provinces through a biproportional apportionment, a more complex mathematical method than the current one.
- The bill would replace closed, blocked party lists with open lists: voters could mark the candidates they prefer on the ballot, and seats would go first to the top of the list and then to the candidates with the most preference votes.
- The explanatory statement justifies the change because votes weigh more in sparsely populated provinces than in densely populated ones, and because the current system favors the most voted parties. It cites reports from the Council of State (Consejo de Estado) and the OSCE.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Voters: They could mark the candidates they prefer on the ballot, not just vote for a fixed list.
- Small political parties: They would find it easier to win seats, though parties with very few votes would be excluded from the allocation.
- Large political parties: The party with the most votes would still get an advantage in the last 25 seats.
- Residents of densely populated provinces: Their provinces would no longer be underrepresented, because seats would be distributed by population.
- Candidates: Their position on the list would no longer guarantee a seat: the preference votes they receive would count.
Words worth knowing
- Método d'Hondt (D'Hondt method)
- A mathematical formula used to allocate seats by votes; it favors the parties with the most votes.
- Método Sainte-Laguë (Sainte-Laguë method)
- Another mathematical formula for allocating seats, more proportional than D'Hondt.
- Reparto biproporcional (biproportional apportionment)
- A method that allocates seats in two steps: first how many go to each party and each province, then how the two allocations are combined.
- Listas cerradas y bloqueadas (closed, blocked lists)
- The current system: you can only vote for a party's full list, and candidates get seats in the order they appear.
- Voto preferencial (preference vote)
- A mark a voter makes next to a candidate's name to show they prefer that candidate.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced10 September 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted16 September 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
7 October 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: By the Union, Progress and Democracy Parliamentary Group, on the reform of Organic Law 5/1985, of 19 June, of the General Electoral Regime, to guarantee greater proportionality (Organic).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 209· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 12 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 1 yes · 22 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 7 yes · 23 no
- Málaga More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 10 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 12 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 52
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 100 against · 10 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 6 against · 4 abst. · 7 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 against · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 8 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 184 | 171 against · 13 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000170
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 209
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.