Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to ban arms trade with invading or occupying states

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 8 August 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.

Official title: Private member's bill regulating the embargo or suspension of arms trade with States that are invaders or occupiers of Territories or States.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000168· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require the Government to suspend all arms trade and transactions with a state that invades and occupies a territory, and to review and, where appropriate, suspend transactions in dual-use goods and services.
  2. It defines invasion as the entry of one state's army or organized personnel into a territory under another state's sovereignty, and occupation as holding another state's territory by force, including displacement of populations and taking natural resources from the territory.
  3. Reports on exports of defense and dual-use material that the Government sends to the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) would include a specific section on the states affected by this law.
  4. The law would apply to occupation situations arising since the founding of the United Nations up to the present, and would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • The Government: Would have to suspend arms trade with invading or occupying states and review dual-use transactions.
  • Arms and dual-use goods companies: Could not trade with invading or occupying states.
  • The Congress of Deputies: Would receive reports with a specific section on the affected states.

Words worth knowing

Doble uso (dual use)
Goods or services that can serve both civilian and military purposes.
Embargo
A ban on trading with a country or on certain products.
Exposición de motivos
The introductory text of a bill explaining why it is proposed.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced8 August 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 September 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2014Dec 2014Mar 2015Jun 2015Sept 201511. 8 August 2014: Presentación22. 2 September 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/09/2014 hasta 05/09/201433. 2 September 2014: Calificación44. 5 September 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 05/09/2014 hasta 11/10/201455. 11 October 2014: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 11/10/2014 hasta 13/10/201566. 13 October 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 13/10/2015 hasta 19/10/2015

13 October 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 22 yes · 185 no · 121 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural Parliamentary Group, regulating the embargo or suspension of arms trade with States that are invaders or occupiers of Territories or States.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 290· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 12 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 38, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 38
  • Abstained: 7
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista108
1 in favour · 6 against · 97 abst. · 4 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
11 in favour · 1 against · 3 abst. · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
15 abst. · 1 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Sin grupo2
2 abst.
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 173 against · 11 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.