What it is
Bill to ban arms trade with invading or occupying states
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 8 August 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill regulating the embargo or suspension of arms trade with States that are invaders or occupiers of Territories or States.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000168· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require the Government to suspend all arms trade and transactions with a state that invades and occupies a territory, and to review and, where appropriate, suspend transactions in dual-use goods and services.
- It defines invasion as the entry of one state's army or organized personnel into a territory under another state's sovereignty, and occupation as holding another state's territory by force, including displacement of populations and taking natural resources from the territory.
- Reports on exports of defense and dual-use material that the Government sends to the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) would include a specific section on the states affected by this law.
- The law would apply to occupation situations arising since the founding of the United Nations up to the present, and would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- The Government: Would have to suspend arms trade with invading or occupying states and review dual-use transactions.
- Arms and dual-use goods companies: Could not trade with invading or occupying states.
- The Congress of Deputies: Would receive reports with a specific section on the affected states.
Words worth knowing
- Doble uso (dual use)
- Goods or services that can serve both civilian and military purposes.
- Embargo
- A ban on trading with a country or on certain products.
- Exposición de motivos
- The introductory text of a bill explaining why it is proposed.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced8 August 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 September 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
13 October 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural Parliamentary Group, regulating the embargo or suspension of arms trade with States that are invaders or occupiers of Territories or States.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 290· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 1 yes · 8 no · 3 abst.
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 4 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 4 yes · 6 no · 17 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes against 3 yes · 20 no · 9 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 6 abst.
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 10 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 12 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 38, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 38
- Abstained: 7
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 108 | 1 in favour · 6 against · 97 abst. · 4 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 11 in favour · 1 against · 3 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Sin grupo | 2 | 2 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 1 in favour · 173 against · 11 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000168
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 290
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.