What it is
Bill to protect vulnerable consumers and fight energy poverty
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 30 April 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill on the protection of vulnerable consumers and against energy poverty.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000159· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would give vulnerable consumers the right to a sufficient energy supply at an affordable price. Vulnerable consumers would be those who do not exceed basic consumption thresholds and are, for example, in households where everyone is unemployed, receive minimum pensions, or have a household income per person below 75 percent of the minimum wage.
- The vulnerable consumer status would apply to electricity, natural gas, butane and propane, and could be extended to other regulated energy supplies.
- It would create an affordable social tariff, approved every quarter by the Council of Ministers at the proposal of the National Commission on Markets and Competition. The cost not covered by these customers would be treated as a system cost, funded through charges or the State Budget.
- It defines energy poverty as the situation of a vulnerable consumer who spends more than 10 percent of annual household income on energy bills for basic domestic needs. Recognition would be granted case by case after an individual review.
- Energy companies could not cut off supply to people in energy poverty without prior authorization from the administration, and never before six months have passed since the first payment request. Cuts would not be authorized during the coldest months or if the supply is essential for the health of the residents.
- The Government would approve, with the autonomous communities, a strategy to eradicate energy poverty, including preferential loans to renovate inefficient homes. People whose supply was cut for nonpayment in the previous twelve months could request reconnection paying only the debt, with no management, connection or reconnection fees.
Who it affects
- Vulnerable consumers (people on minimum pensions, households where everyone is unemployed, low-income families, large families).: Would have the right to a sufficient supply at an affordable price through the social tariff.
- People recognized as being in energy poverty.: Could not be disconnected without prior authorization or during the coldest months.
- Energy supply companies.: Would need prior authorization to cut supply and would bear the social tariff cost as a system cost.
- The Government, autonomous communities and city councils.: Would have to approve a strategy against energy poverty and designate the bodies that authorize supply cuts until a specific procedure exists.
Words worth knowing
- Tarifa social (social tariff)
- A reduced, regulated energy price for those entitled to it.
- Consumidor vulnerable (vulnerable consumer)
- A person or family with low income or in a difficult situation who needs energy for basic needs.
- Pobreza energética (energy poverty)
- The situation of someone who spends more than 10 percent of annual income on energy bills for basic needs.
- Coste del sistema (system cost)
- An expense spread across the whole energy system instead of being paid only by some consumers.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced30 April 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted6 May 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
14 October 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the protection of vulnerable consumers and against energy poverty.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 212· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 15 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 13 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 37, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 8
- Against: 37
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 96 in favour · 14 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 11 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 12 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 7 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 176 against · 9 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XI Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to protect vulnerable consumers and fight energy poverty
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Protection for people who cannot afford power and gas
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Bill would protect vulnerable consumers and fight energy poverty
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000159
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 212
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.