Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to protect vulnerable consumers and fight energy poverty

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 30 April 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill on the protection of vulnerable consumers and against energy poverty.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000159· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would give vulnerable consumers the right to a sufficient energy supply at an affordable price. Vulnerable consumers would be those who do not exceed basic consumption thresholds and are, for example, in households where everyone is unemployed, receive minimum pensions, or have a household income per person below 75 percent of the minimum wage.
  2. The vulnerable consumer status would apply to electricity, natural gas, butane and propane, and could be extended to other regulated energy supplies.
  3. It would create an affordable social tariff, approved every quarter by the Council of Ministers at the proposal of the National Commission on Markets and Competition. The cost not covered by these customers would be treated as a system cost, funded through charges or the State Budget.
  4. It defines energy poverty as the situation of a vulnerable consumer who spends more than 10 percent of annual household income on energy bills for basic domestic needs. Recognition would be granted case by case after an individual review.
  5. Energy companies could not cut off supply to people in energy poverty without prior authorization from the administration, and never before six months have passed since the first payment request. Cuts would not be authorized during the coldest months or if the supply is essential for the health of the residents.
  6. The Government would approve, with the autonomous communities, a strategy to eradicate energy poverty, including preferential loans to renovate inefficient homes. People whose supply was cut for nonpayment in the previous twelve months could request reconnection paying only the debt, with no management, connection or reconnection fees.

Who it affects

  • Vulnerable consumers (people on minimum pensions, households where everyone is unemployed, low-income families, large families).: Would have the right to a sufficient supply at an affordable price through the social tariff.
  • People recognized as being in energy poverty.: Could not be disconnected without prior authorization or during the coldest months.
  • Energy supply companies.: Would need prior authorization to cut supply and would bear the social tariff cost as a system cost.
  • The Government, autonomous communities and city councils.: Would have to approve a strategy against energy poverty and designate the bodies that authorize supply cuts until a specific procedure exists.

Words worth knowing

Tarifa social (social tariff)
A reduced, regulated energy price for those entitled to it.
Consumidor vulnerable (vulnerable consumer)
A person or family with low income or in a difficult situation who needs energy for basic needs.
Pobreza energética (energy poverty)
The situation of someone who spends more than 10 percent of annual income on energy bills for basic needs.
Coste del sistema (system cost)
An expense spread across the whole energy system instead of being paid only by some consumers.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced30 April 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 May 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2014Sept 201411. 30 April 2014: Presentación22. 6 May 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/05/2014 hasta 09/05/201433. 6 May 2014: Calificación44. 9 May 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/05/2014 hasta 16/06/201455. 16 June 2014: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/06/2014 hasta 14/10/201466. 14 October 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 14/10/2014 hasta 17/10/2014

14 October 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 135 yes · 177 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the protection of vulnerable consumers and against energy poverty.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 212· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 8
  • Against: 37
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
96 in favour · 14 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
11 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote
GC-CiU16
12 in favour · 4 did not vote
GIP11
7 in favour · 4 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
176 against · 9 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.