Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to expand Spanish courts' universal jurisdiction again

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 30 April 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, regarding universal jurisdiction (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000158· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, seeks to repeal the 2014 reform of universal jurisdiction, which it says sharply limited the ability of Spanish courts to try serious crimes and human rights violations committed outside Spain.
  2. It would amend Article 23 of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary so that Spanish courts could try crimes committed abroad by Spaniards or foreigners who later acquired Spanish nationality, subject to certain requirements: the act must be punishable where it was committed, the victim or the Public Prosecutor must file a complaint, and the offender must not have already been acquitted, pardoned or sentenced abroad.
  3. The list of crimes that could be tried even if committed abroad includes genocide, crimes against humanity, terrorism, torture, piracy, drug trafficking, sexual offenses against minors, female genital mutilation, human trafficking, corruption and forced disappearance, among others. To try them, it would have to be shown that the suspected offenders are in Spain, that there are Spanish victims or a relevant connection to Spain, and that no other competent country or international court has already effectively investigated the acts.
  4. The bill expressly repeals Organic Law 1/2014 of March 13 and would take effect on the same day it is published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Victims of serious crimes or human rights violations committed outside Spain.: They would regain the ability to file complaints and seek justice in Spanish courts.
  • People suspected of those crimes who are in Spain or hold Spanish nationality.: They could be investigated and tried by Spanish courts.
  • Spanish judges and courts, particularly the National Court (Audiencia Nacional).: Their jurisdiction over crimes committed abroad would be expanded.
  • The Public Prosecutor's Office (Ministerio Fiscal).: It could file complaints or charges in these cases.

Words worth knowing

Justicia universal (universal jurisdiction)
A principle allowing a country's courts to try very serious crimes committed in another country, even if neither victims nor offenders are from that country.
Lesa humanidad (crimes against humanity)
Very serious, widespread crimes against civilians, such as murders or deportations committed systematically.
Querella (criminal complaint)
A filing by which a person asks a judge to open a criminal case and act against someone.
Sobreseimiento (dismissal of proceedings)
A judge's decision to end a criminal case.
Subsidiariedad (subsidiarity)
The idea that a country acts only when the primarily competent country does not.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced30 April 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 May 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2014Sept 201411. 30 April 2014: Presentación22. 6 May 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/05/2014 hasta 09/05/201433. 6 May 2014: Calificación44. 9 May 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/05/2014 hasta 16/06/201455. 16 June 2014: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/06/2014 hasta 16/12/201466. 16 December 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 16/12/2014 hasta 22/12/2014

16 December 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 152 yes · 172 no · 7 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, regarding universal jurisdiction (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 234· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 33, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 10
  • Against: 33
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
107 in favour · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
9 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. · 6 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 in favour
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
170 against · 6 abst. · 9 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.