What it is
Bill would give Spanish Parliament more say in EU decisions
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 3 April 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill on the participation of the Cortes Generales in the adoption of European Union policies.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000156· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would replace Law 8/1994 with a new law so that the Spanish Parliament (Cortes Generales) takes part in setting Spain's position before EU institutions. It keeps the structure and workings of the Joint Committee for the European Union.
- The Joint Committee could invite Members of the European Parliament and EU institution officials to appear before it. These invitations would not involve parliamentary oversight, and those invited would have no duty to attend.
- Parliamentary groups, Deputies or Senators could request debates on current EU affairs with a special impact on Spain. These debates could reach the full chambers of the Congress of Deputies or the Senate.
- The Government would have to send a quarterly report on its position on EU legislative proposals and appear before the Joint Committee every six months. It would also appear before the full Congress after each European Council meeting.
- The Joint Committee could issue reasoned opinions on breaches of the principle of subsidiarity and ask the Government to bring an annulment action before the Court of Justice of the European Union. The Government could rule this out with reasons.
- Regional governments could request to appear before the Joint Committee to report on the impact of EU rules on their powers. Regional parliaments could send their own opinions on subsidiarity.
Words worth knowing
- Comisión Mixta para la Unión Europea (Joint Committee for the European Union)
- A body made up of Deputies and Senators that handles EU affairs.
- Principio de subsidiariedad (principle of subsidiarity)
- The idea that the EU should only legislate when deciding at EU level works better than deciding in each country.
- Recurso de anulación (annulment action)
- A case before the Court of Justice of the European Union asking to strike down an EU act.
- Consejo Europeo (European Council)
- The meeting of the heads of state or government of EU countries.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced3 April 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted8 April 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
28 October 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the participation of the Cortes Generales in the adoption of European Union policies.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 219· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 18 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 36, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 9
- Against: 36
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 108 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 5 abst. · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 in favour · 1 abst. |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 184 | 2 in favour · 173 against · 9 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000156
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 219
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.