What it is
Bill would let city councils spend budget surpluses on sustainable investments
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 5 March 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill to promote sustainable investment by local entities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000153· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend the sixteenth additional provision of the consolidated Local Government Finance Law to define what counts as a financially sustainable investment, so that budget surpluses could be spent on investments.
- It proposes considering sustainable those investments that foster long-term economic growth, listing spending programs that include housing, water, waste, social services, employment, education, culture, sports, transport or roads, among others.
- The investment must not undermine the local council's financial sustainability during its useful life, and it must generate revenue covering its maintenance costs or reduce other expenses.
- Each investment would require an economic report signed by the president of the local corporation, with annual reporting to the full council. In addition, investments made with the 2012 and 2013 surpluses would not count toward the 2014 deficit.
Who it affects
- City councils and other local entities with a budget surplus.: They could spend the surplus if they meet the proposed requirements.
- Residents of municipalities, the final beneficiaries of investments in services and public works.: They would benefit from investments in their municipality.
- Presidents of local corporations, who would have to sign the economic report for each investment.: A new paperwork duty if the bill is passed.
Words worth knowing
- Superávit (surplus)
- When a budget's revenue exceeds its spending, that is, money left over.
- Corporación local (local corporation)
- The official name for the city council and other entities that govern a municipality.
- Vida útil (useful life)
- The period during which an investment, such as a public work or facility, can be used.
- Disposición adicional (additional provision)
- A part of a law that adds supplementary rules to the main articles.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced5 March 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted11 March 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
25 November 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialista Parliamentary Group, to promote sustainable investment by local entities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 228· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 33, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 10
- Against: 33
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 106 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 13 in favour · 2 against · 3 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 171 against · 1 abst. · 13 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000153
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 228
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.