What it is
Bill to allow energy self-consumption without extra charges
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 February 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill on energy self-consumption.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000152· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill responds to the economic and administrative barriers that, according to the text, block the development of energy self-consumption, including the backup toll charged even on energy produced and consumed instantly.
- The bill would regulate renewable energy self-generation for one's own use under a net metering system: consumers who generate more than they use could feed the surplus into the grid and recover it at no cost within one year.
- Household consumers, public centers and small businesses could join, with no power limit except for shared installations, capped at 10 MW. Instantly consumed energy would pay no tolls, and deferred consumption would pay reduced ones.
- The bill would also change the penalty regime of Law 24/2013: it removes one section and redefines offenses related to self-generation, distinguishing minor from serious ones.
Who it affects
- Household consumers: Could generate their own renewable energy and offset grid consumption with their surpluses.
- Small businesses: Could join the net metering system to cut energy costs.
- Public centers: Could install self-generation with no power limit.
- Electricity companies: Would have to deduct surpluses fed into the grid from consumers' bills.
Words worth knowing
- Autoconsumo (self-consumption)
- Producing energy, for example with solar panels, for your own use.
- Balance neto (net metering)
- A system that offsets the energy you generate and feed into the grid against what you consume from it.
- Peaje de respaldo (backup toll)
- A charge for using the power grid even when all the energy you generate is used at home.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A draft law introduced by members of Congress that still needs to be debated and passed; it is not in force.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced20 February 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 February 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
23 June 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the IU, ICV, EUiA, CHA: The Left Plural Parliamentary Group, on energy self-consumption.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 274· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 19 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD and Sin grupo. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 7
- Against: 35
- Tie: 10
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 106 | 98 in favour · 8 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 11 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 15 | 12 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Sin grupo | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 184 | 169 against · 15 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000152
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 274
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.