What it is
Bill would let workers ask to end their contracts if the employer does nothing
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 February 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).
Official title: Private member's bill to enable workers to initiate a collective redundancy procedure for the termination of their contracts when the employer fails to start the procedure and they are disadvantaged as a result.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000150· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would bring back a procedure that existed before the 2012 labor reform and was removed then. It applied when the company does not start a collective dismissal and workers suffer serious harm as a result.
- The bill would add a section 12 to Article 51 of the Workers' Statute. If it can reasonably be assumed that the employer's failure to start a collective dismissal could cause harm that is impossible or very hard to repair, workers, through their representatives, could ask the labor authority to declare the end of their employment relationship. The authority would decide what steps and reports are needed, including one from the Labor Inspectorate, and would rule within the deadlines set for the consultation period.
- The bill would add a paragraph h) to Article 208 of the General Social Security Law. A ruling by the labor authority issued at the workers' request would then count as a ground for ending the contract for Social Security purposes.
- If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Workers at loss-making companies that owe wages or social security contributions and do not start a collective dismissal: They could ask the labor authority to end their contracts so they can access unemployment benefits sooner.
- Workers' representatives: They would submit the request to the labor authority.
- The competent labor authority: It would have to rule within the consultation-period deadlines, with a report from the Labor Inspectorate.
Words worth knowing
- Expediente de regulación de empleo (ERE)
- A procedure to end or suspend employment contracts for economic, technical, organizational, or production reasons.
- Despido colectivo
- Collective dismissal: ending the contracts of a large number of a company's workers.
- Autoridad laboral
- The public authority that oversees and decides on labor matters.
- Inspección de Trabajo
- The public body that enforces labor rules.
- Prestaciones de desempleo
- Unemployment benefits: money the state pays to people who have lost their job.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced13 February 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted18 February 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
16 June 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Catalan Parliamentary Group (Convergència i Unió), to enable workers to initiate a collective redundancy procedure for the termination of their contracts, when the employer does not start the procedure and they are disadvantaged by it.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 271· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 16 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 13 yes · 16 no · 3 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 38, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 10
- Against: 38
- Tie: 4
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 109 | 98 in favour · 11 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 2 abst. · 7 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 12 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 171 against · 14 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000150
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 271
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.