Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would let workers ask to end their contracts if the employer does nothing

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 February 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).

Official title: Private member's bill to enable workers to initiate a collective redundancy procedure for the termination of their contracts when the employer fails to start the procedure and they are disadvantaged as a result.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000150· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would bring back a procedure that existed before the 2012 labor reform and was removed then. It applied when the company does not start a collective dismissal and workers suffer serious harm as a result.
  2. The bill would add a section 12 to Article 51 of the Workers' Statute. If it can reasonably be assumed that the employer's failure to start a collective dismissal could cause harm that is impossible or very hard to repair, workers, through their representatives, could ask the labor authority to declare the end of their employment relationship. The authority would decide what steps and reports are needed, including one from the Labor Inspectorate, and would rule within the deadlines set for the consultation period.
  3. The bill would add a paragraph h) to Article 208 of the General Social Security Law. A ruling by the labor authority issued at the workers' request would then count as a ground for ending the contract for Social Security purposes.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Workers at loss-making companies that owe wages or social security contributions and do not start a collective dismissal: They could ask the labor authority to end their contracts so they can access unemployment benefits sooner.
  • Workers' representatives: They would submit the request to the labor authority.
  • The competent labor authority: It would have to rule within the consultation-period deadlines, with a report from the Labor Inspectorate.

Words worth knowing

Expediente de regulación de empleo (ERE)
A procedure to end or suspend employment contracts for economic, technical, organizational, or production reasons.
Despido colectivo
Collective dismissal: ending the contracts of a large number of a company's workers.
Autoridad laboral
The public authority that oversees and decides on labor matters.
Inspección de Trabajo
The public body that enforces labor rules.
Prestaciones de desempleo
Unemployment benefits: money the state pays to people who have lost their job.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced13 February 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted18 February 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2014Jun 2014Sept 2014Dec 2014Mar 201511. 13 February 2014: Presentación22. 18 February 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 18/02/2014 hasta 21/02/201433. 18 February 2014: Calificación44. 21 February 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 21/02/2014 hasta 29/03/201455. 29 March 2014: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 29/03/2014 hasta 16/06/201566. 16 June 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 16/06/2015 hasta 22/06/2015

16 June 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 128 yes · 171 no · 12 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Catalan Parliamentary Group (Convergència i Unió), to enable workers to initiate a collective redundancy procedure for the termination of their contracts, when the employer does not start the procedure and they are disadvantaged by it.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 271· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 38, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 10
  • Against: 38
  • Tie: 4
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista109
98 in favour · 11 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
9 in favour · 2 abst. · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
12 in favour · 4 did not vote
GIP11
10 abst. · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
171 against · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.