What it is
Bill proposes pre-enactment Constitutional Court review of autonomy statutes
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 January 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Organic private member's bill to amend Organic Law 2/1979, of 3 October, on the Constitutional Court, to restore the prior appeal of unconstitutionality for Organic Bills on Statutes of Autonomy or their amendment.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000141· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would bring back the prior unconstitutionality appeal for bills on autonomy statutes or their reform. This appeal had been removed by organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. 4/1985 of June 7.
- It would amend Article 2 of the Organic Law on the Constitutional Court to add prior constitutionality review among its functions, in the cases provided for in the Constitution and in that law.
- A new Article 79 would regulate the prior appeal against the final text of a statute bill after it passes both Chambers. The deadline to file it would be three days, and filing it would automatically suspend the bill's progress.
- If the Court finds the text unconstitutional, the process could not continue until the Cortes Generales delete or amend the affected provisions. The rule would not apply to statute reforms already in progress when the law takes effect.
Who it affects
- The Cortes Generales (Spanish Parliament), because the appeal would freeze the processing of statute bills.: They would have to delete or amend the provisions found unconstitutional before moving on.
- The Constitutional Court, which would gain a new prior review role.: It would handle these appeals, which must be filed within a very short three-day window.
- Autonomous communities with statute reforms underway.: Reforms already in progress would not be subject to the new appeal.
Words worth knowing
- Recurso previo de inconstitucionalidad (prior unconstitutionality appeal)
- An appeal filed with the Constitutional Court before a rule is definitively passed, to check whether it fits the Constitution.
- Estatuto de autonomía (autonomy statute)
- The basic rule of each autonomous community, similar to a small constitution for that community.
- Precepto (provision)
- Each article or section of a legal rule.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is withdrawn.
- Introduced24 January 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 January 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments28 February 2014Groups propose changes.
- Committee11 June 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
18 June 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendment to the whole with alternative text submitted by the Catalan (Convergència i Unió) Parliamentary Group.
This law had 5 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 39 of sitting 273· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 12 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 9 yes · 16 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 3 yes · 27 no · 1 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 10 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 13 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of Socialista, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 48, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 3
- Against: 48
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 108 | 91 against · 2 abst. · 15 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 7 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 172 against · 2 abst. · 11 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
Whoever introduced it withdrew it, or it was merged into another one. It goes no further.
Presented before in:
- IX Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected· nearly the same title Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 2/1979, of 3 October, on the Constitutional Court, for the recovery of the prior appeal of unconstitutionality for Government bills for Organic Laws of Statutes of Autonomy or their amendment (Organic).
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000141
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 39 of sitting 273
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.