What it is
Bill to fine companies that pay suppliers late
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 January 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 3/2004, of 29 December, establishing measures to combat late payment in commercial transactions, in order to regulate a regime of infringements and sanctions.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000137· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would add to Law 3/2004 against late payment a new title with infractions and penalties for missing payment deadlines and terms, something not specifically regulated until now.
- It classifies infractions as minor, serious and very serious. For example, exceeding the legal payment deadline by more than twenty days would be serious, and systematically missing payment deadlines to the detriment of small and medium-sized companies would be very serious.
- Fines would range from up to €6,000 for minor infractions to €900,000 for very serious ones. After a third repeat offense of a very serious infraction, regional governments could temporarily close the offending company for up to one year.
- To help companies adapt, it proposes discounts on fines: 100% for the first six months, 80% up to one year, 50% in the second year and 20% in the third, provided the company immediately corrects the cause of the infraction.
Who it affects
- Companies and public administrations that pay suppliers: They could be fined if they miss payment deadlines or terms.
- Small and medium-sized supplier companies: They would be the main group protected against late payments.
- Regional governments (comunidades autónomas): They would be in charge of inspecting and penalizing infractions.
Words worth knowing
- Morosidad
- Late payment or non-payment of debts within the agreed deadline.
- Reincidencia
- Committing the same infraction again within a short period of time.
- Prescripción
- The maximum time limit to penalize an infraction or enforce a penalty; once it passes, action is no longer possible.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by parliamentary groups to become law; it is not yet approved.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced22 January 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 January 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
13 May 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Catalan Parliamentary Group (Convergència i Unió) to amend Law 3/2004, of December 29, establishing measures to combat late payment in commercial transactions, in order to regulate a regime of infractions and sanctions.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 187· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 13 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 9
- Against: 35
- Tie: 8
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 93 in favour · 1 abst. · 16 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 12 in favour · 2 against · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 1 in favour · 172 against · 1 abst. · 11 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000137
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 187
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.