Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to fine companies that pay suppliers late

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 January 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).

Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 3/2004, of 29 December, establishing measures to combat late payment in commercial transactions, in order to regulate a regime of infringements and sanctions.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000137· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would add to Law 3/2004 against late payment a new title with infractions and penalties for missing payment deadlines and terms, something not specifically regulated until now.
  2. It classifies infractions as minor, serious and very serious. For example, exceeding the legal payment deadline by more than twenty days would be serious, and systematically missing payment deadlines to the detriment of small and medium-sized companies would be very serious.
  3. Fines would range from up to €6,000 for minor infractions to €900,000 for very serious ones. After a third repeat offense of a very serious infraction, regional governments could temporarily close the offending company for up to one year.
  4. To help companies adapt, it proposes discounts on fines: 100% for the first six months, 80% up to one year, 50% in the second year and 20% in the third, provided the company immediately corrects the cause of the infraction.

Who it affects

  • Companies and public administrations that pay suppliers: They could be fined if they miss payment deadlines or terms.
  • Small and medium-sized supplier companies: They would be the main group protected against late payments.
  • Regional governments (comunidades autónomas): They would be in charge of inspecting and penalizing infractions.

Words worth knowing

Morosidad
Late payment or non-payment of debts within the agreed deadline.
Reincidencia
Committing the same infraction again within a short period of time.
Prescripción
The maximum time limit to penalize an infraction or enforce a penalty; once it passes, action is no longer possible.
Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by parliamentary groups to become law; it is not yet approved.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced22 January 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted28 January 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2014Feb 2014Mar 2014Apr 201411. 22 January 2014: Presentación22. 28 January 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 28/01/2014 hasta 31/01/201433. 28 January 2014: Calificación44. 31 January 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 31/01/2014 hasta 08/03/201455. 8 March 2014: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/03/2014 hasta 13/05/201466. 13 May 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 13/05/2014 hasta 19/05/2014

13 May 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 139 yes · 174 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Catalan Parliamentary Group (Convergència i Unió) to amend Law 3/2004, of December 29, establishing measures to combat late payment in commercial transactions, in order to regulate a regime of infractions and sanctions.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 187· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 9
  • Against: 35
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
93 in favour · 1 abst. · 16 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
12 in favour · 2 against · 4 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 172 against · 1 abst. · 11 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.