What it is
Proposal to limit when Spanish courts try crimes committed abroad
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 January 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, regarding universal jurisdiction.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000136· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would limit so-called universal justice: Spanish courts could only investigate crimes committed outside Spain in the cases covered by international treaties and under clear conditions. The goal is to define with legal certainty which foreign crimes Spanish justice can pursue.
- For crimes committed abroad by Spaniards or by foreigners who later acquired Spanish nationality, three requirements would apply: the act must also be a crime where it was committed, the victim or the Public Prosecutor's Office must file a criminal complaint, and the offender must not have already been acquitted, pardoned or sentenced abroad.
- The bill lists which crimes committed abroad Spanish courts could try and under what conditions: genocide, torture, forced disappearance, piracy, terrorism, drug trafficking, human trafficking, sexual offenses against minors, violence against women, corruption, counterfeit medical products and others required by treaties. Each category has specific requirements, such as the accused being Spanish or living in Spain, or the victim having Spanish nationality or residence.
- Spanish courts could not pursue these crimes if proceedings have already started in an International Court or in the country where the acts were committed or of the accused's nationality. There is an exception if that State is unwilling or genuinely unable to investigate, a question the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court would assess using the criteria of the Statute of the International Criminal Court.
- Crimes under sections 3 and 4 could only be prosecuted in Spain if the victim or the Public Prosecutor's Office files a criminal complaint. In addition, ongoing cases that do not meet the new requirements would be dismissed.
Who it affects
- Victims of crimes committed outside Spain: They could only bring the case to Spanish courts by filing a criminal complaint and if the new requirements are met.
- People investigated for crimes committed abroad: They could argue that proceedings already exist in another country or court, and open cases that do not meet the requirements would be dismissed.
- Public Prosecutor's Office (Ministerio Fiscal): Together with the victim, it would be responsible for filing the complaint needed to prosecute these crimes in Spain.
- Second Chamber of the Supreme Court (Sala 2.ª del Tribunal Supremo): It would assess whether the other State is unwilling or unable to investigate, to decide whether Spanish justice can act.
Words worth knowing
- Justicia universal (universal justice)
- The power of a country's courts to try serious crimes committed in other countries, even if they do not directly affect that country.
- Querella (criminal complaint)
- A filing by which a person asks a court to open a criminal case and accuses someone of a crime.
- Ministerio Fiscal (Public Prosecutor's Office)
- The public body (the prosecution service) that takes part in criminal trials defending the law and the public interest.
- Sobreseimiento (dismissal of the case)
- A decision to close a criminal case without it going to trial.
- Extradición (extradition)
- Handing a person over to another country or court so they can be tried or serve a sentence there.
It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced17 January 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted21 January 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments20 February 2014Groups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary18 February 2014All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate27 February 2014The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE12 March 2014It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
27 February 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, regarding Universal Jurisdiction, as it is being processed in a single reading and has an organic character.
This law had 15 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 13 of sitting 172· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 22 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 38 most voted in favour; in 9, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 38
- Against: 9
- Tie: 4
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 97 against · 13 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 18 | 1 in favour · 7 against · 10 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 against · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 8 against · 3 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 179 in favour · 1 against · 5 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000136
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 13 of sitting 172
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.