Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to limit when Spanish courts try crimes committed abroad

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 January 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, regarding universal jurisdiction.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000136· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would limit so-called universal justice: Spanish courts could only investigate crimes committed outside Spain in the cases covered by international treaties and under clear conditions. The goal is to define with legal certainty which foreign crimes Spanish justice can pursue.
  2. For crimes committed abroad by Spaniards or by foreigners who later acquired Spanish nationality, three requirements would apply: the act must also be a crime where it was committed, the victim or the Public Prosecutor's Office must file a criminal complaint, and the offender must not have already been acquitted, pardoned or sentenced abroad.
  3. The bill lists which crimes committed abroad Spanish courts could try and under what conditions: genocide, torture, forced disappearance, piracy, terrorism, drug trafficking, human trafficking, sexual offenses against minors, violence against women, corruption, counterfeit medical products and others required by treaties. Each category has specific requirements, such as the accused being Spanish or living in Spain, or the victim having Spanish nationality or residence.
  4. Spanish courts could not pursue these crimes if proceedings have already started in an International Court or in the country where the acts were committed or of the accused's nationality. There is an exception if that State is unwilling or genuinely unable to investigate, a question the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court would assess using the criteria of the Statute of the International Criminal Court.
  5. Crimes under sections 3 and 4 could only be prosecuted in Spain if the victim or the Public Prosecutor's Office files a criminal complaint. In addition, ongoing cases that do not meet the new requirements would be dismissed.

Who it affects

  • Victims of crimes committed outside Spain: They could only bring the case to Spanish courts by filing a criminal complaint and if the new requirements are met.
  • People investigated for crimes committed abroad: They could argue that proceedings already exist in another country or court, and open cases that do not meet the requirements would be dismissed.
  • Public Prosecutor's Office (Ministerio Fiscal): Together with the victim, it would be responsible for filing the complaint needed to prosecute these crimes in Spain.
  • Second Chamber of the Supreme Court (Sala 2.ª del Tribunal Supremo): It would assess whether the other State is unwilling or unable to investigate, to decide whether Spanish justice can act.

Words worth knowing

Justicia universal (universal justice)
The power of a country's courts to try serious crimes committed in other countries, even if they do not directly affect that country.
Querella (criminal complaint)
A filing by which a person asks a court to open a criminal case and accuses someone of a crime.
Ministerio Fiscal (Public Prosecutor's Office)
The public body (the prosecution service) that takes part in criminal trials defending the law and the public interest.
Sobreseimiento (dismissal of the case)
A decision to close a criminal case without it going to trial.
Extradición (extradition)
Handing a person over to another country or court so they can be tried or serve a sentence there.

It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced17 January 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted21 January 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments20 February 2014Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary18 February 2014All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate27 February 2014The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE12 March 2014It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2014Jan 2014Feb 2014Feb 2014Feb 2014Feb 2014Mar 2014Mar 201411. 17 January 2014: Presentación22. 21 January 2014: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 21/01/2014 hasta 24/01/201433. 21 January 2014: Calificación44. 24 January 2014: Gobierno Contestación desde 24/01/2014 hasta 03/02/201455. 3 February 2014: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 03/02/2014 hasta 11/02/201466. 11 February 2014: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 11/02/2014 hasta 18/02/201477. 18 February 2014: Pleno desde 18/02/2014 hasta 20/02/2014 Nota: Se acuerda la tramitación directa y en lectura única.88. 20 February 2014: Pleno Enmiendas desde 20/02/2014 hasta 25/02/201499. 25 February 2014: Pleno Aprobación desde 25/02/2014 hasta 27/02/20141010. 27 February 2014: Senado desde 27/02/2014 hasta 12/03/20141111. 12 March 2014: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 12/03/2014 hasta 01/04/2014

27 February 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 180 yes · 137 no

Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, regarding Universal Jurisdiction, as it is being processed in a single reading and has an organic character.

This law had 15 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 13 of sitting 172· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 38 most voted in favour; in 9, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 38
  • Against: 9
  • Tie: 4
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
97 against · 13 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto18
1 in favour · 7 against · 10 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 against · 2 did not vote
GIP11
8 against · 3 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
179 in favour · 1 against · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.