What it is
Bill to open up flights to and from the Canary Islands
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 December 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Official title: Private member's bill to liberalize air traffic with origin or destination in the Canary Islands.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000128· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would liberalize air traffic with origin or destination at Canary Islands airports. That is its stated purpose.
- Airlines from countries with air transport agreements with Spain could operate flights from or to the Canary Islands to or from third countries, with full fifth freedom rights, with no limits on routes, frequencies or capacity. Flights within Spain (cabotage) would not be included, and reciprocity would not be required, although airlines must show they comply with the rules applied to international routes with Spain.
- If the airline is not designated in the agreement with the other country, or if fifth freedom traffic is not covered by it, the Ministry of Public Works would notify that country's authorities and, if needed, start the process to amend the agreement.
- The bill would give the Canary Islands a role in planning and managing their airports of general interest, together with the Canary Islands Government and, where applicable, the island councils and town councils where they are located. In addition, the Government would have six months to issue implementing rules, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Foreign airlines: Could operate flights with origin or destination in the Canary Islands to or from third countries, with full fifth freedom rights.
- The Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands and its island and town councils: Would take part in planning and managing the Canary Islands airports of general interest.
- Ministry of Public Works (Ministerio de Fomento): Would notify other countries of cases not covered by agreements and process any needed amendments.
Words worth knowing
- Quinta libertad (fifth freedom)
- The right of an airline to carry passengers or cargo between two countries other than its own, on a flight that starts or ends in its home country.
- Cabotaje (cabotage)
- Flights connecting points within the same country, in this case within Spain.
- Reciprocidad (reciprocity)
- Requiring from another country the same that country requires from ours. The bill would not require it.
- Aeropuertos de interés general (airports of general interest)
- Airports that the State, not a regional government, is in charge of.
- Cabildos
- The governing institutions of each island in the Canary Islands.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced4 December 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted10 December 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
30 April 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Mixed Parliamentary Group to liberalize air traffic with origin or destination in the Canary Islands.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 184· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 14 yes · 13 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 34, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 12
- Against: 34
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 100 in favour · 10 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 1 abst. · 8 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 in favour |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 1 in favour · 168 against · 16 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000128
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 184
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.