What it is
Proposal to make non-contributory disability pensions compatible with paid work
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 November 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).
Official title: Private member's bill to improve the compatibility of non-contributory disability pensions with remunerated work.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000124· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill seeks to improve the compatibility of non-contributory disability pensions with paid work, building on what Law 8/2005 already allowed.
- The bill would raise the limit on earnings compatible with the pension: the sum of pension and earnings could not exceed twice the IPREM Indicador público de renta de efectos múltiples: a public reference amount used to set income limits for benefits and aid. per year. If it does, the pension is reduced by 50 % of the excess, and the sum may never exceed three times the IPREM.
- It would also remove the current four-year limit, so that combining the pension with work would be indefinite.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado (official state gazette).
Who it affects
- People with disabilities receiving a non-contributory disability pension: They could work longer and earn more without losing the pension entirely.
- People with disabilities starting a paid activity: They would be registered and would pay social security contributions when doing paid work.
Words worth knowing
- Pensión no contributiva (non-contributory pension)
- A social security pension for people with disabilities who have not paid enough social security contributions to get an ordinary pension.
- IPREM
- Indicador público de renta de efectos múltiples: a public reference amount used to set income limits for benefits and aid.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text proposing a law that still must be debated and passed by Congress; it is not in force.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced13 November 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted19 November 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
16 September 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the Catalan Parliamentary Group (Convergència i Unió), to improve the compatibility of non-contributory disability pensions with paid work.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 203· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 6 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 15 yes · 13 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD and Sin grupo. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 35
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 109 | 98 in favour · 11 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 13 in favour · 2 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 8 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 168 against · 17 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000124
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 203
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.