What it is
Bill would set requirements for mortgage floor clauses in Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 31 October 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill regulating floor clauses in mortgage loan contracts.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000122· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill sets requirements for floor clauses limiting interest reductions in mortgages on homes or on premises that are the borrower's main source of income: they must appear in a special section of the deed, be accepted before a notary with a clear explanation, and the borrower must sign that they understand them.
- If both an upper and a lower limit are agreed, they must be proportional and set the same variation in both directions. The deed must also include simulations of interest rate scenarios and compare the cost with fixed-rate mortgages.
- If those requirements are not met, the clause would be void and the lender would have to refund the amounts improperly charged for it.
- For mortgages signed before the law takes effect, lenders would have six months to adapt the clauses to the new rules, unless the borrower expressly waives this. If six months pass without adaptation, the clause would be void and refunds would apply.
Who it affects
- People with a mortgage on their home or on premises that is their main source of income: Their floor clauses would only be valid if they meet the bill's requirements, and they could recover overcharges if they do not.
- Guarantors or non-debtor mortgagors: They too would have to accept the clauses before a notary for the clauses to bind them.
- Banks and other lenders: They would have to adapt old clauses within six months or refund amounts charged if the clause is declared void.
Words worth knowing
- Cláusula suelo (floor clause)
- A mortgage term that stops the interest you pay from falling below a set minimum.
- Prestatario (borrower)
- The person who receives the loan money, that is, who takes out the mortgage.
- Fiador o hipotecante no deudor (guarantor or non-debtor mortgagor)
- Someone who backs the loan or offers their home as collateral without being the one who borrowed the money.
- Diligencia del notario (notary's note)
- A note the notary adds to the deed recording what was explained and signed by each party.
- Nulidad radical (full nullity)
- The clause is treated as if it never existed and has no effect.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced31 October 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 November 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
18 November 2014
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the Socialist Parliamentary Group, regulating floor clauses in mortgage loan contracts.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 225· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 34, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 34
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 106 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 16 in favour · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 12 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 169 against · 16 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000122
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 225
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.