What it is
Proposal to keep families from being unable to pay for power and gas
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 31 October 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill on measures to prevent energy poverty.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000121· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill defines energy poverty as the difficulty of keeping a home at an adequate temperature or having other essential energy services at a fair price, and creates the figure of the vulnerable consumer, whose requirements the Government would set and review each year.
- It creates a social bonus with a public price for electricity, natural gas and butane, based on household income, with minimum vital consumption levels that vary by household size and season. The cost would be borne by the energy supply companies.
- It bans cutting off electricity, gas or water for nonpayment during the winter for families that meet the income conditions to be set, or with a report from social services, and requires the Government to draw up a plan against energy poverty.
- It applies a reduced VAT rate to domestic gas and electricity as basic goods, and requires utility companies to include energy poverty in their corporate social responsibility plans and to publish quarterly data on unpaid bills and supply cutoffs.
Who it affects
- Households with low income or at risk of social exclusion: They would get a social bonus with reduced electricity and gas prices, and their supply could not be cut off in winter for nonpayment.
- Vulnerable consumers: The Government would set each year who they are and what requirements they must meet to guarantee basic supplies.
- Energy supply companies: They would cover the cost of the social bonus, could not cut off supply in winter to protected families, and would have to publish quarterly data on unpaid bills and cutoffs.
- People living in rented homes: A family living in a rented apartment could also apply for the social bonus if they meet the requirements.
Words worth knowing
- Bono social (social bonus)
- A discount on the electricity or gas bill for households with low income.
- Tregua invernal (winter truce)
- A period of the year, in this case winter, when supply cannot be cut off for not paying the bill.
- IVA reducido (reduced VAT)
- A lower rate of value added tax, the tax applied to most purchases.
- Consumidor vulnerable (vulnerable consumer)
- A person at risk of losing basic home supplies for personal, economic or social reasons.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced31 October 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 November 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
17 December 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill on measures to prevent energy poverty.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 157· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 6 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 34, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 34
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 104 in favour · 6 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 14 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 in favour |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 172 against · 13 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000121
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 157
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.