What it is
Bill to create a public fund to help social nonprofits
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 7 October 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).
Official title: Private member's bill on the creation of the Fund for the Restructuring of Non-profit Entities of the Third Sector (FRETS).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000118· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create the Fund for the Restructuring of Nonprofit Entities of the Third Sector (FRETS). Private nonprofits working in activities of general interest could receive aid if they meet the definition in the bill itself.
- The Fund would be financed through the General State Budgets, with 100 million euros the first year. In later years, ownerless assets, abandoned deposits, unclaimed insurance payments and similar resources ending up in State hands would be added.
- The money would be distributed among the Autonomous Communities based on the number of entities in each one, and they would manage and grant it. Small or medium entities struggling to get funding, mergers between entities, and projects with viability plans would have priority.
- The Fund could also cover up to 30% of losses an entity accumulated over the last three fiscal years, if it presents a viability plan. In addition, the Government would have to promote social venture capital using part of ENISA's funds.
Who it affects
- Nonprofit entities of the social Third Sector: Could receive aid from the Fund for their viability, investments or new projects.
- Autonomous Communities: Would manage, grant and pay out the funds to entities in their territory.
- General State Administration: Would co-govern the Fund and finance it through the General State Budgets.
Words worth knowing
- Tercer Sector (Third Sector)
- Private nonprofit organizations that meet social needs, such as NGOs and associations.
- Capital riesgo social (social venture capital)
- Money invested in social companies or organizations by buying shares, seeking a benefit for society in addition to profits.
- Bienes vacantes (ownerless assets)
- Assets with no known owner, such as abandoned deposits or inheritances without heirs, which pass to the State.
- Sucesión abintestato (intestate succession)
- The inheritance of a person who died without a will.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced7 October 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 October 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
26 November 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill on the creation of the Fund for the Restructuring of Non-profit Entities of the Third Sector (FRETS).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 151· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 18 yes · 7 no · 3 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 13 yes · 16 no · 3 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 9 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 9
- Against: 35
- Tie: 8
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 104 in favour · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 13 in favour · 1 abst. · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 177 against · 8 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000118
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 151
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.