Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to ban corporate donations to parties and speed up audits

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 2 September 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 8/2007, of 4 July, on the financing of political parties.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000113· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would allow political parties to receive donations only from individuals, never from companies or other entities, and would ban donations from people who provide services or works to public administrations or public companies under a contract.
  2. It would set a limit of 100,000 euros per donor per year and ban anonymous, earmarked or revocable donations. Donations would have to be paid into exclusive bank accounts and recorded with the donor's details.
  3. It would cut oversight deadlines in half: annual accounts would be sent to the Court of Auditors by April 1 of the following year, and the Court would issue its report within three months.
  4. Parties could not receive funding from foreign governments or public companies, and parties would have to adapt their internal rules within one month. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette.

Who it affects

  • Political parties: They could only accept donations from individuals, with amount limits and more accounting and oversight duties.
  • People who donate to a party: A maximum of 100,000 euros per year, with a receipt and payment into a specific bank account.
  • Companies and entities working for public administrations: Their donations to parties would be banned, even indirectly.
  • The Court of Auditors (Tribunal de Cuentas): It would have shorter deadlines to review party accounts and issue its report.

Words worth knowing

Donación finalista (earmarked donation)
A donation given for a specific purpose set by the donor. The bill would only allow donations with no designated purpose.
Donación nominativa (named donation)
A donation where the identity of the donor is known, as opposed to anonymous ones.
Tribunal de Cuentas (Court of Auditors)
The public body that audits the accounts of institutions and checks that they comply with the law.
Proposición de Ley Orgánica (organic law bill)
A text proposing changes to a special type of law, introduced by a parliamentary group and not yet passed.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced2 September 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 September 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2013Oct 2013Nov 201311. 2 September 2013: Presentación22. 10 September 2013: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 10/09/2013 hasta 13/09/201333. 10 September 2013: Calificación44. 13 September 2013: Gobierno Contestación desde 13/09/2013 hasta 21/10/201355. 21 October 2013: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 21/10/2013 hasta 10/12/201366. 10 December 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/12/2013 hasta 13/12/2013

10 December 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 130 yes · 172 no · 23 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 8/2007, of 4 July, on the financing of political parties.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 154· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 6
  • Against: 35
  • Abstained: 2
  • Tie: 9
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
103 in favour · 7 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto18
12 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst. · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 abst.
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
171 against · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.