Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill proposes tougher punishment for political corruption

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 2 September 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's organic bill to reform the Penal Code.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000112· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would extend the time limits for prosecuting crimes such as bribery, embezzlement or abuse of office when public officials are involved. Prescription means a crime can no longer be punished after a certain time passes.
  2. It would add four new crimes related to political party funding: falsifying party accounts, hiding evidence of those crimes, repeatedly accepting illegal donations or failing to file accounts, and making donations that break the funding law.
  3. The bill would bring back the pre-2012 version of the tax fraud offense, so that anyone who regularizes their tax situation before the tax authorities come after them would be exempt from criminal liability. The threshold for the crime would be 50,000 euros.
  4. It would create a new crime of unjustified enrichment: a public official whose wealth grows during their time in office and who cannot explain where the money came from could face six months to one year in prison and a fine.

Who it affects

  • Public officials and civil servants: They could face longer prosecution periods and a new crime if they cannot justify the origin of their wealth.
  • Party representatives and managers: New prison terms and fines for falsifying accounts, accepting illegal donations or failing to file accounts.
  • Individuals or companies donating to parties: They could be punished for donations that break the party funding law.
  • Tax fraudsters: They could avoid punishment if they regularize their situation in time, but the crime applies above 50,000 euros.

Words worth knowing

Prescripción (prescription)
A crime can no longer be prosecuted after a set period of time has passed since it was committed.
Prevaricación (abuse of office)
When a judge or public official knowingly issues unfair rulings or decisions.
Cohecho (bribery)
When an official asks for or accepts gifts or money in exchange for doing or not doing something in their position.
Malversación de caudales públicos (embezzlement of public funds)
When an official uses public money for purposes other than those it was allocated for.
Hacienda Pública (Public Treasury)
The income and spending of the state, regional governments and local councils, in other words, everyone's money.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced2 September 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 September 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2013Dec 201411. 2 September 2013: Presentación22. 10 September 2013: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 10/09/2013 hasta 13/09/201333. 10 September 2013: Calificación44. 13 September 2013: Gobierno Contestación desde 13/09/2013 hasta 21/10/201355. 21 October 2013: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 21/10/2013 hasta 14/04/201566. 14 April 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 14/04/2015 hasta 17/04/2015

14 April 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 142 yes · 183 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialista Parliamentary Group, Organic bill to reform the Penal Code.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 253· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD and Sin grupo. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 38, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 6
  • Against: 38
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
104 in favour · 6 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
3 in favour · 2 did not vote
Mixto18
6 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. · 9 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP10
10 in favour
GUPyD4
4 in favour
Sin grupo1
1 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
181 against · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.