What it is
Bill proposes 4% VAT for tourism in flood-hit Pyrenees areas
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 June 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 37/1992, of December 28, on Value Added Tax, to establish a temporary super-reduced rate for tourism services provided by entities operating and fiscally domiciled in the Val d'Aran, the Catalan Upper Pyrenees, and the Huesca Pyrenees.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000111· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would add a new section to the VAT Law to apply a 4% rate during 2013 and 2014 to tourist services provided by entities operating and with their tax domicile in Val d'Aran, Pallars Jussà, Pallars Subirà, Alta Ribargorça and Valle de Benasque.
- The reduced rate would specifically cover hotel, camping and spa services, restaurant services and, in general, the supply of meals and drinks for immediate consumption.
- The Government would have a maximum of three months from the law's entry into force to approve the necessary regulatory changes.
- The law would enter into force the day after its publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado, and any provisions conflicting with it would be repealed.
Who it affects
- Tourism businesses in Val d'Aran, Pallars Jussà, Pallars Subirà, Alta Ribargorça and Valle de Benasque: They could apply the 4% rate to their tourist services during 2013 and 2014.
- Hotels, campsites, spas and restaurants in those areas: Their services would be expressly included in the reduced rate.
- Tourists visiting those areas: They would pay less VAT on tourist services.
- The Government: It would have to approve the regulatory rules to implement the measure within three months.
Words worth knowing
- Tipo superreducido (super-reduced rate)
- A VAT percentage lower than usual. Here it would be 4%.
- Domicilio fiscal (tax domicile)
- The address where a company is registered with the tax authorities.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text submitted by a parliamentary group to become law. It is not approved yet.
- Disposición derogatoria (repeal provision)
- Part of a law stating which earlier rules stop applying.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced26 June 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted1 July 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
15 October 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill to amend Law 37/1992, of 28 December, on Value Added Tax, to establish a temporary super-reduced rate for tourism services provided by entities operating and having their tax domicile in the Val d'Aran, in the Catalan Upper Pyrenees and in the Huesca Pyrenees.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 137· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 13 yes · 19 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 10
- Against: 35
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 104 in favour · 6 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 1 against · 8 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 171 against · 14 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000111
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 137
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.