What it is
Bill proposing tougher measures against tax fraud
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 25 June 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill on measures to intensify the prevention and fight against tax fraud.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000110· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend the General Tax Law: broader liability for company administrators and for those subcontracting works or services, five-year limitation periods (ten years in serious cases such as fraud over €600,000 or organized groups), more effective precautionary measures, and the power to seize movable property of companies controlled by the debtor.
- It would reserve the objective estimation method under personal income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. (IRPF) for activities selling to a final consumer. Activities with a certain economic level would have to file under simplified direct estimation and the general VAT regime.
- It would lower the cash payment limit between businesses or professionals to €1,000, remove the €15,000 limit for non-residents, and raise the fine to 50 percent of the amount paid in cash.
- It would require periodic official reports on the underground economy and tax and labor fraud, prepared by independent experts and broken down by territory, sector and tax. The reports would be debated in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) and Senate, and in regional parliaments.
- It would create the Cuerpo Superior Técnico de Hacienda by merging three existing corps, allowing the 8,500 technicians of the Ministry of Finance to take on higher-level duties. It would also direct the Government to seek international agreements for the automatic exchange of information on activities abroad and in tax havens.
- It would require publishing in the Official State Gazette the identity and declared amounts of those who used the 2012 tax amnesty under royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 12/2012, verifying within one year that the funds came from lawful sources, and it would repeal the provision allowing that regularization process to be repeated.
Who it affects
- Businesses and professionals, who could not pay operations of €1,000 or more in cash and would face fines of 50 percent.: New payment limits and penalties.
- Company administrators and representatives, who would be presumed liable for tax offenses unless they prove otherwise.: Greater tax liability.
- Companies that contract out or subcontract works or services, liable for their contractors' tax debts if they do not provide a certificate of being up to date with tax obligations.: Liability for subcontracting.
- Self-employed people and small businesses, since fewer of them could use the objective estimation method under personal income tax.: Change in tax filing method.
- Those who used the 2012 tax amnesty, whose identity and declared amounts would be published and whose funds would be reviewed.: Publication and review of declared funds.
Words worth knowing
- Prescripción
- The maximum time the tax authority has to collect a debt or a taxpayer has to claim a refund. Once it passes, the right expires.
- Estimación objetiva
- A simplified way for certain small businesses to calculate taxes using fixed modules (such as floor space or number of workers) instead of actual income and expenses.
- Medidas cautelares
- Provisional measures the tax authority can take to make sure it can collect a debt, such as freezing accounts or assets while the case is open.
- Paraíso fiscal
- A country or territory with very low or no taxes, used to hide money or pay less tax.
- Amnistía fiscal
- A process allowing undeclared money to be regularized by paying less than would normally be due. The bill also calls it 'regularización fiscal'.
- royal decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced25 June 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted1 July 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
29 October 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliamentary Group of IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: The Left Plural, of measures to intensify the prevention and fight against tax fraud.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 142· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 15 yes · 7 no · 7 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 4 most voted in favour; in 35, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 4
- Against: 35
- Abstained: 3
- Tie: 10
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 102 in favour · 1 abst. · 7 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 11 in favour · 2 against · 5 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 174 against · 11 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000110
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 142
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.