What it is
Bill would shield social benefits and wages from seizure
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 April 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill on improving the protection of minimum incomes and social aid.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000103· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would make social benefits that cover basic needs exempt from seizure: unemployment benefits, the active insertion income, farm worker subsidies, the PREPARA program, regional minimum incomes, dependency benefits, and study grants.
- It would raise the amount of salary, wage or pension that cannot be seized: 1.5 times the minimum wage, plus 30% more for each family member with no income of their own.
- If what a person earns exceeds that limit, only the excess could be seized, at rates from 30% to 90% depending on the amount.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People receiving social benefits or subsidies.: Those payments could no longer be seized.
- Families with members who have no income of their own.: They could keep a larger share of wages or pensions safe from seizure.
- Debtors whose wages or pensions exceed the current limit.: A smaller portion of their income could be seized.
- Students and people in situations of dependency.: Their grants and benefits would be protected from seizure.
Words worth knowing
- Inembargable
- Exempt from seizure: it cannot be taken to pay a debt through a court order.
- Salario mínimo interprofesional
- The minimum wage, the lowest pay employers can legally offer in Spain.
- Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil
- The Spanish law governing civil court proceedings, including seizures.
- Renta activa de inserción
- A Spanish benefit for unemployed people who have trouble finding work.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced26 April 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted30 April 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
25 June 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill on improving the protection of minimum incomes and social aid.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 118· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 22 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Madrid Tie 14 yes · 14 no · 1 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 34, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 34
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 98 in favour · 12 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 14 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 in favour |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 170 against · 1 abst. · 14 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000103
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 118
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.