Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would shield social benefits and wages from seizure

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 April 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill on improving the protection of minimum incomes and social aid.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000103· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would make social benefits that cover basic needs exempt from seizure: unemployment benefits, the active insertion income, farm worker subsidies, the PREPARA program, regional minimum incomes, dependency benefits, and study grants.
  2. It would raise the amount of salary, wage or pension that cannot be seized: 1.5 times the minimum wage, plus 30% more for each family member with no income of their own.
  3. If what a person earns exceeds that limit, only the excess could be seized, at rates from 30% to 90% depending on the amount.
  4. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • People receiving social benefits or subsidies.: Those payments could no longer be seized.
  • Families with members who have no income of their own.: They could keep a larger share of wages or pensions safe from seizure.
  • Debtors whose wages or pensions exceed the current limit.: A smaller portion of their income could be seized.
  • Students and people in situations of dependency.: Their grants and benefits would be protected from seizure.

Words worth knowing

Inembargable
Exempt from seizure: it cannot be taken to pay a debt through a court order.
Salario mínimo interprofesional
The minimum wage, the lowest pay employers can legally offer in Spain.
Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil
The Spanish law governing civil court proceedings, including seizures.
Renta activa de inserción
A Spanish benefit for unemployed people who have trouble finding work.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced26 April 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted30 April 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Apr 2013May 201311. 26 April 2013: Presentación22. 30 April 2013: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 30/04/2013 hasta 06/05/201333. 30 April 2013: Calificación44. 6 May 2013: Gobierno Contestación desde 06/05/2013 hasta 12/06/201355. 12 June 2013: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 12/06/2013 hasta 25/06/201366. 25 June 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 25/06/2013 hasta 28/06/2013

25 June 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 147 yes · 170 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill on improving the protection of minimum incomes and social aid.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 118· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 34, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 34
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
98 in favour · 12 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
14 in favour · 4 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
170 against · 1 abst. · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.