Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

A 1 billion euro fund to help people in poverty and social exclusion

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 12 April 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill to create an Emergency Fund against Poverty and Social Exclusion.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000100· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create an Emergency Fund against Poverty and Social Exclusion worth 1 billion euros, to strengthen direct aid to people in poverty and help pay for the regional governments' minimum insertion incomes.
  2. The money would be split in three parts: 400 million for municipal social services, 400 million for the autonomous communities to top up minimum insertion incomes, and 200 million for NGOs and third sector entities through grants.
  3. Fundable programs would include food and housing cost aid (electricity, gas, water, heating), school meal grants and school supplies, job search programs, home help, and last resort shelters such as hostels and reception centers.
  4. The Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality would set the criteria for distributing the money, and would have to do so within one month. Before that, it would hear the autonomous communities, the Spanish Federation of Municipalities and Provinces, and the State Council of Social Action NGOs.
  5. The credits would be financed with public debt, and money not spent in 2013 could be carried over to the next year. The NGO grants would have to be announced within two months of the law taking effect, which would be the day it is published in the Official State Gazette.
  6. According to the explanatory statement, the Fund would create or maintain 30,000 jobs, benefit more than 500,000 families, and add more than 83,000 people to the recipients of minimum insertion incomes.

Who it affects

  • People in poverty or at risk of social exclusion: They would receive direct aid for food, housing, education, employment or shelter.
  • Municipal governments: They would have 400 million euros for their basic social services.
  • Autonomous communities (Spain's regional governments): They would receive 400 million euros to top up minimum insertion incomes.
  • NGOs and third sector entities: They could apply for grants from a total of 200 million euros.

Words worth knowing

Rentas mínimas de inserción (minimum insertion income)
Cash benefits paid by Spain's regional governments to people or families without enough income to live on.
Tercer sector (third sector)
Nonprofit organizations, such as NGOs, devoted to social causes.
Crédito extraordinario (extraordinary credit)
Extra money added to the state budget to pay for a new expense.
Proposición de ley (bill)
A text in the form of a law introduced by a parliamentary group, but not yet passed or in force.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced12 April 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 April 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Apr 2013May 201311. 12 April 2013: Presentación22. 16 April 2013: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 16/04/2013 hasta 19/04/201333. 16 April 2013: Calificación44. 19 April 2013: Gobierno Contestación desde 19/04/2013 hasta 29/05/201355. 29 May 2013: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 29/05/2013 hasta 11/06/201366. 11 June 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 11/06/2013 hasta 14/06/2013

11 June 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 149 yes · 179 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill to create an Emergency Fund against Poverty and Social Exclusion.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 112· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 10
  • Against: 37
  • Tie: 5
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
102 in favour · 1 against · 7 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
12 in favour · 2 abst. · 4 did not vote
GC-CiU16
15 in favour · 1 did not vote
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
178 against · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.