What it is
Bill to stop evictions and help families in debt
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 25 October 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill on measures against evictions, over-indebtedness, and insolvency.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000081· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill seeks to balance the position of the mortgage debtor against the bank: it sets that the appraisal value used in foreclosure cannot be lower than the one used to grant the loan, and caps late-payment interest at 2 points above the regular interest rate, even by agreement.
- It reforms the rules for auctioning a foreclosed home to prevent it from being awarded at very low prices. It distinguishes between a primary residence and other assets, and lets the debtor bring a third party with a better bid or keep the property by paying what is owed.
- It promotes the out-of-court sale before a notary, a faster and cheaper procedure than going to court, with a single auction, and provides that if the buyer assigns the property for a higher price, the original owner receives 30 % of the difference.
- It strengthens the independence of appraisal companies and limits over-indebtedness: for a primary residence, mortgage loans could not exceed 30 years or 80 % of the appraisal value, and it sets limits on interest rate variability.
- It expands the Code of Good Practices of royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 6/2012 to more families: it raises the income threshold to two and a half times the IPREM A public income indicator used in Spain to measure whether a family has low income., lowers to 50 % the share of income the mortgage payment must exceed, and requires banks with FROB stakes to join. It also reduces the annual rent paid by the former owner who stays as a tenant after handing over the home.
- It creates an out-of-court procedure before a notary, prior to insolvency proceedings, for consumers with non-fraudulent over-indebtedness due to unforeseen causes, a kind of 'fresh start'. If the agreement fails, the judge could even release the debtor from unpaid debts after a period of three to five years.
Who it affects
- Families struggling to pay the mortgage on their primary home: They would get more protections in foreclosure, caps on late-payment interest, and access to the expanded Code of Good Practices.
- Consumers over-indebted due to unforeseen causes, such as unemployment or divorce: They could use a notarial payment agreement and, if it fails, insolvency proceedings with possible debt discharge.
- Guarantors of mortgage loans: They would receive improved notices and their liability would not be unfairly increased.
- Credit institutions, especially those with FROB stakes: They would be required to join the Code of Good Practices and the notarial agreement, and face stricter transparency rules.
- Appraisal companies: They would have to be more independent and face a tougher sanctioning regime.
Words worth knowing
- Ejecución hipotecaria (foreclosure)
- The process by which the bank takes the mortgaged home when the loan is not paid.
- Dación en pago (deed in lieu of payment)
- Handing the home over to the bank to cancel the debt.
- IPREM
- A public income indicator used in Spain to measure whether a family has low income.
- Concurso de acreedores (insolvency proceedings)
- A court procedure to divide the assets of someone who cannot pay their debts among all creditors.
- Intereses de demora (late-payment interest)
- Extra charge applied when a payment is made late.
- royal decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced25 October 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted29 October 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
18 December 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill on measures against evictions, over-indebtedness, and insolvency.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 78· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Madrid Tie 15 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 36, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 8
- Against: 36
- Tie: 8
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 100 in favour · 10 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 3 | 3 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 10 in favour · 2 against · 6 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 12 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 in favour |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 173 against · 12 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000081
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 78
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.