What it is

Private member's bill to amend the consolidated text of the State Passive Classes Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 670/1987, of 30 April, in order to equalize the orphan's pension with the General Social Security System.

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 October 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Follow this law

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000080· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

Introduced1 October 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted9 October 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 6 official steps on a timeline

18 June 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 134 yes · 172 no · 17 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill to amend the consolidated text of the State Passive Classes Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 670/1987, of 30 April, in order to equalize the orphan's pension with the General Social Security System.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 115· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 34, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 8
Against: 34
Abstained: 2
Tie: 8

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	102 in favour · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 in favour
Mixto	18	12 in favour · 2 abst. · 4 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	15 abst. · 1 did not vote
GIP	11	10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD	5	5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	185	172 against · 13 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to raise the age limit for orphan's pensions in state classes

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000080
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 115
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Private member's bill to amend the consolidated text of the State Passive Classes Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 670/1987, of 30 April, in order to equalize the orphan's pension with the General Social Security System. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original