Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to tighten the law on banning political parties

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 June 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law regarding the reform of Organic Law 6/2002, of June 27, on Political Parties.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000066· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the Unión Progreso y Democracia group, would reform the Political Parties Law to stop illegal parties or parties that support terrorism from using legal tricks to run in elections.
  2. It would amend Article 9.3(a) to state that repeatedly failing to condemn terrorism counts as tacit support and is enough to outlaw a party or deny its registration. An ambiguous or generic condemnation would not suffice, and a court ruling that a clear condemnation was enough would not erase other evidence against the party.
  3. It would add a new paragraph (j) to Article 9.3: a party could be outlawed for spreading ideas that deny or justify terrorism, denying the criminal nature of its acts or claiming a supposed just cause.
  4. It would reform Article 9.4 to detail what evidence counts: the party's documents and statements, public events, leaders' declarations, and sanctions and criminal convictions of its members. Statutes and programs would no longer be the only criterion, and politicians' silences could count as stances.
  5. If passed, the law would take effect on the day of its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Political parties: They could be outlawed or denied registration for failing to condemn terrorism or for spreading denialism.
  • Party leaders, candidates and members: Their acts, statements, silences, sanctions and criminal convictions would count as evidence against the party.
  • Victims of terrorism: The bill seeks to prevent the legitimization and trivialization of terrorism and genocide.

Words worth knowing

Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
A Spanish law reserved for major matters, such as fundamental rights, requiring stronger majorities to pass.
Ilegalización (outlawing of a party)
A court decision declaring a party illegal, barring it from operating and running in elections.
Prueba indiciaria (circumstantial evidence)
Evidence based on clues that, taken together, allow a conclusion without direct proof.
Proposición de Ley Orgánica
A bill introduced by a parliamentary group; in this case it has not been passed yet.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced27 June 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 July 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2012Sept 2012Dec 2012Mar 201311. 27 June 2012: Presentación22. 3 July 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 03/07/2012 hasta 06/07/201233. 3 July 2012: Calificación44. 6 July 2012: Gobierno Contestación desde 06/07/2012 hasta 06/10/201255. 6 October 2012: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 06/10/2012 hasta 09/04/201366. 9 April 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 09/04/2013 hasta 12/04/2013

9 April 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 5 yes · 321 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill for an Organic Law regarding the reform of Organic Law 6/2002, of June 27, on Political Parties.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 95· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of GUPyD. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 52
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
107 against · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto18
14 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote
GC-CiU16
15 against · 1 did not vote
GIP11
11 against
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
169 against · 16 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.