What it is
Bill to tighten the law on banning political parties
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 June 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law regarding the reform of Organic Law 6/2002, of June 27, on Political Parties.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000066· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by the Unión Progreso y Democracia group, would reform the Political Parties Law to stop illegal parties or parties that support terrorism from using legal tricks to run in elections.
- It would amend Article 9.3(a) to state that repeatedly failing to condemn terrorism counts as tacit support and is enough to outlaw a party or deny its registration. An ambiguous or generic condemnation would not suffice, and a court ruling that a clear condemnation was enough would not erase other evidence against the party.
- It would add a new paragraph (j) to Article 9.3: a party could be outlawed for spreading ideas that deny or justify terrorism, denying the criminal nature of its acts or claiming a supposed just cause.
- It would reform Article 9.4 to detail what evidence counts: the party's documents and statements, public events, leaders' declarations, and sanctions and criminal convictions of its members. Statutes and programs would no longer be the only criterion, and politicians' silences could count as stances.
- If passed, the law would take effect on the day of its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Political parties: They could be outlawed or denied registration for failing to condemn terrorism or for spreading denialism.
- Party leaders, candidates and members: Their acts, statements, silences, sanctions and criminal convictions would count as evidence against the party.
- Victims of terrorism: The bill seeks to prevent the legitimization and trivialization of terrorism and genocide.
Words worth knowing
- Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
- A Spanish law reserved for major matters, such as fundamental rights, requiring stronger majorities to pass.
- Ilegalización (outlawing of a party)
- A court decision declaring a party illegal, barring it from operating and running in elections.
- Prueba indiciaria (circumstantial evidence)
- Evidence based on clues that, taken together, allow a conclusion without direct proof.
- Proposición de Ley Orgánica
- A bill introduced by a parliamentary group; in this case it has not been passed yet.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced27 June 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 July 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
9 April 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill for an Organic Law regarding the reform of Organic Law 6/2002, of June 27, on Political Parties.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 95· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 11 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 0 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 0 yes · 28 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 4 yes · 26 no
- Málaga More votes against 0 yes · 9 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 9 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 0 yes · 11 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 14 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GUPyD. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 52
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 107 against · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 18 | 14 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 against · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 against |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 169 against · 16 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000066
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 95
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.