What it is
Bill to prevent corruption and make government more transparent
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 December 2011. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.
Official title: Private member's bill on measures against political corruption and for democratic regeneration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000026· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would bar people charged with crimes against the Public Administration from running for office once an order to open trial has been issued and has become final.
- It would tighten public procurement rules: limit minor contracts (under €15,000 for works and €6,000 for others), require advertising for all contracts, and expand the cases where companies are barred from contracting.
- It would make conflict-of-interest rules stricter for elected officials and senior officials, who could not hold more than a 5% stake in companies contracting with the public sector, and would bar mayors and councilors from also being members of parliament.
- It would depoliticize the Court of Auditors and public employment: its counselors would be chosen like judges, staff positions filled by personal appointment would be capped by law, and public executives would serve five-year terms with annual evaluations.
- It would require political parties to publish their consolidated annual accounts by June 30 of the following year, free of charge on their websites, and bring their entire organization under the Court of Auditors' oversight.
- It would create public registries of subsidies and government contracts, publish budgets, accounts of public companies and officials' pay online, and ban institutional ad campaigns that tout the government's achievements.
Who it affects
- Elected officials and senior public officials: They would face stricter conflict-of-interest rules, declare their professional activities, and have their pay published.
- Political parties: They would have to publish consolidated accounts and submit to oversight by the Court of Auditors.
- Companies that contract with or receive public funds: Minor contracts would be capped and they would face advertising and transparency obligations.
- Public employees: Personal appointment positions would be limited and performance evaluations regulated.
- The general public: People could check budgets, contracts, subsidies and government accounts online.
Words worth knowing
- Imputado
- A person a judge considers a suspect in a crime, before any conviction.
- Contrato menor
- A low-value public contract that can be awarded without a formal bidding process.
- Personal eventual
- Trusted staff freely appointed by a public official, not career civil servants.
- Incompatibilidad
- A ban on holding public office while having certain private interests, such as shares in a company that contracts with the administration.
- Ley Orgánica
- A special type of Spanish law, reserved for major matters like fundamental rights, requiring enhanced majorities to pass.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced22 December 2011Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 December 2011The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
17 September 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill on measures against political corruption and for democratic regeneration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 128· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 7 no · 4 abst.
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 3 yes · 17 no · 10 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes against 6 yes · 14 no · 8 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 0 yes · 6 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 6 abst.
- Soria Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 9 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), GC-CiU and Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 43, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 43
- Abstained: 3
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 104 abst. · 6 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 18 | 2 in favour · 4 against · 4 abst. · 8 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 against · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 170 against · 15 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000026
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 128
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.