What it is
Proposal so small businesses and the self-employed pay VAT only when paid
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 21 December 2011. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán (Convergència i Unió).
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 37/1992, of December 28, on Value Added Tax.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000021· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill addresses a problem: companies pay VAT when they issue an invoice, even if the client has not paid them yet. According to the text, the self-employed were advancing almost 2,000 million euros in VAT on unpaid invoices.
- The bill would change this by applying the so-called cash criterion: VAT would be declared when payment is received, not when the invoice is issued. It relies on a 2010 European directive that allows this.
- The bill would add a new section to Article 75 of the VAT Law. Under it, small and medium-sized businesses and the self-employed would pay the tax only on amounts they have actually collected.
- The Government would have three months from the law's entry into force to approve the necessary implementing regulations. The law would enter into force the day after its publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado (official state gazette).
Who it affects
- Small and medium-sized businesses: They could declare VAT only when they collect invoices, not when they issue them.
- Self-employed workers: The same cash-collection criterion would apply to them for VAT.
- The Government: It would have three months to approve the necessary regulatory changes.
Words worth knowing
- Criterio de caja (cash criterion)
- A way of calculating the tax under which you pay when you receive the money, not when you issue the invoice.
- Devengo (accrual)
- The moment the obligation to pay the tax arises.
- Sujeto pasivo (taxable person)
- The person or business required to pay the tax.
- Directiva europea (European directive)
- A European Union rule that requires member countries to adapt their laws to what it says.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced21 December 2011Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 December 2011The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
19 June 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill amending Law 37/1992, of December 28, on Value Added Tax.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 40· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 12 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 13 yes · 15 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Lleida Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 6 yes · 20 no
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 10 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 13 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Socialista and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 47, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 3
- Against: 47
- Tie: 2
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 101 against · 1 abst. · 8 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 17 | 12 in favour · 2 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 16 in favour |
| GIP | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 1 in favour · 176 against · 8 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000021
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 40
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.