Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to make accessibility works easier in homeowners' communities

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 December 2011. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Official title: Private member's bill on improving accessibility in housing communities.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000015· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill proposes a targeted reform of civil legislation so that accessibility works in homeowners' communities can actually be carried out. The text reviews earlier changes in this area since the Horizontal Property Law.
  2. The bill would reform Article 569 of the Civil Code. Easements of passage aimed at removing architectural barriers would require owners of neighboring properties to allow, on their property, the construction of the elements needed to guarantee accessibility and permanent access to the building, in exchange for compensation. Before using private properties, it would have to be shown that the work cannot first be done using the common elements of the community.
  3. The bill would reform Article 585 of the Civil Code, which bans building within three meters when there is a right to views over the neighboring property. That rule would not apply to works that remove architectural barriers, as long as it is shown that the technical solution is the only possible one.
  4. The bill would reform Article 1936 of the Civil Code so that the common elements of a building, described in Article 396, cannot be acquired through adverse possession.

Words worth knowing

Servidumbre de paso (easement of passage)
The right to use part of someone else's property, for example to cross it.
Barreras arquitectónicas (architectural barriers)
Features of a building that make access or movement hard for people with disabilities, such as stairs without a ramp.
Prescripción (adverse possession)
Acquiring or losing a right through the passage of time.
Predio (o finca)
Real property, such as land or a building.
Comuneros
People who share ownership of a property, such as the common elements of a building.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced16 December 2011Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted21 December 2011The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2011Mar 2012Jun 201211. 16 December 2011: Presentación22. 21 December 2011: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 21/12/2011 hasta 27/12/201133. 21 December 2011: Calificación44. 27 December 2011: Gobierno Contestación desde 27/12/2011 hasta 03/03/201255. 3 March 2012: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 03/03/2012 hasta 25/09/201266. 25 September 2012: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 25/09/2012 hasta 02/10/2012

25 September 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 144 yes · 169 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill on improving accessibility in housing communities.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 57· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 37
  • Tie: 4
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
100 in favour · 10 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
11 in favour · 2 abst. · 5 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso183
169 against · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.