What it is
Bill to make accessibility works easier in homeowners' communities
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 December 2011. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).
Official title: Private member's bill on improving accessibility in housing communities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000015· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes a targeted reform of civil legislation so that accessibility works in homeowners' communities can actually be carried out. The text reviews earlier changes in this area since the Horizontal Property Law.
- The bill would reform Article 569 of the Civil Code. Easements of passage aimed at removing architectural barriers would require owners of neighboring properties to allow, on their property, the construction of the elements needed to guarantee accessibility and permanent access to the building, in exchange for compensation. Before using private properties, it would have to be shown that the work cannot first be done using the common elements of the community.
- The bill would reform Article 585 of the Civil Code, which bans building within three meters when there is a right to views over the neighboring property. That rule would not apply to works that remove architectural barriers, as long as it is shown that the technical solution is the only possible one.
- The bill would reform Article 1936 of the Civil Code so that the common elements of a building, described in Article 396, cannot be acquired through adverse possession.
Words worth knowing
- Servidumbre de paso (easement of passage)
- The right to use part of someone else's property, for example to cross it.
- Barreras arquitectónicas (architectural barriers)
- Features of a building that make access or movement hard for people with disabilities, such as stairs without a ramp.
- Prescripción (adverse possession)
- Acquiring or losing a right through the passage of time.
- Predio (o finca)
- Real property, such as land or a building.
- Comuneros
- People who share ownership of a property, such as the common elements of a building.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced16 December 2011Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted21 December 2011The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
25 September 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill on improving accessibility in housing communities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 57· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 37, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 37
- Tie: 4
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 100 in favour · 10 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 11 in favour · 2 abst. · 5 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 183 | 169 against · 14 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- IX Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected Private member's bill on improving accessibility in housing communities.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000015
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 57
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.