What it is
Publication in the official gazette of final convictions for tax fraud
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 30 May 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law regulating access to and publication of certain information contained in judgments issued in matters of tax fraud.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000160· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- A new Article 235 ter is added to the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary. It makes public access to personal data in final criminal judgments for crimes against the Public Treasury, punishable insolvency harming the Public Treasury, and smuggling harming the State or European Union Treasury.
- The Judicial Secretary will issue a certificate with the data identifying the case, the name of the convicted person or civilly liable party, the crime, the penalties, and the amount of harm caused to the Public Treasury. The Judicial Secretary will order its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
- Publication does not apply if the convicted person or the civilly liable party has paid or deposited the full amount of the harm caused to the Public Treasury before the judgment becomes final.
- The law applies to judgments issued after it takes effect, and it takes effect two months after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- People convicted of tax fraud, punishable insolvency, and smuggling, and civilly liable parties: Their personal data will be published in the Official State Gazette, unless they paid the full harm before the judgment became final.
- Judicial Secretaries (Secretarios Judiciales): They must issue the certificate with the conviction data and order its publication in the official gazette.
- The general public: Anyone can publicly access the data of these final convictions.
Words worth knowing
- Sentencia firme (final judgment)
- A court ruling that can no longer be appealed or changed.
- Secretario Judicial (Judicial Secretary)
- A court official with public faith powers who certifies court actions and manages the enforcement of judgments.
- Responsable civil (civilly liable party)
- A person who, without being convicted of the crime, must pay the compensation arising from it.
- Insolvencia punible (punishable insolvency)
- The crime of hiding or faking one's own insolvency (being unable to pay debts) to harm creditors.
- Hacienda Pública (Public Treasury)
- The State's revenues and spending, that is, public funds.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced30 May 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 June 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments3 June 2015Groups propose changes.
- Committee24 June 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary14 July 2015All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate16 July 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE3 September 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
16 July 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Joint vote on the Organic bill regulating access to and publication of certain information contained in judgments rendered in matters of tax fraud, as it has an organic character.
This law had 13 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 63 of sitting 280· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 5 yes · 11 no · 10 abst.
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 18 yes · 9 no · 7 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla Tie 5 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 40 most voted in favour; in 2, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 40
- Against: 2
- Abstained: 2
- Tie: 8
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 109 | 100 against · 9 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 1 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. · 12 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 181 in favour · 4 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Private member's bill for an Organic Law regulating access to and publication of certain information contained in judgments issued in matters of tax fraud.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 10/2015, of September 10, regulating access to and publication of certain information contained in judgments issued in matters of tax fraud.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000160
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 63 of sitting 280
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2015-9768
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.