Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

More safeguards for suspects and rules for tech-based investigations

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 13 March 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the Criminal Procedure Act to strengthen procedural guarantees and regulate technological investigation measures.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000139· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. It strengthens the right to defense: anyone accused of a crime can have a lawyer from the start, speak with them in private, and receive information about the charges in language they understand, adapted to their age or disability.
  2. It improves the rights of detainees: they must be informed in writing, in plain language, of the charges and their rights, they can meet privately with their lawyer even before giving a statement, and the lawyer must arrive at the detention center within three hours. It also covers the right to notify a family member, call a third party, and contact the consulate for foreign nationals.
  3. It limits incommunicado detention: it is only allowed when urgently needed to protect people or the proceedings, lasts at most five days (extendable by five more in specific cases), and can never be applied to minors under sixteen.
  4. It regulates tech-based investigation measures by law, such as interception of phone and internet communications, recording of conversations, tracking and location, searches of mass storage devices, and remote searches of computers. All of them require judicial authorization and must meet the principles of specialty, suitability, exceptionality, necessity, and proportionality.
  5. It sets maximum time limits for these measures: communications interception can last three months, extendable up to eighteen; remote searches of computers, one month extendable up to three; and data preservation orders, ninety days extendable up to one hundred eighty. In addition, recordings must be deleted once the proceedings end.
  6. It replaces the word imputado with investigado or encausado throughout the Criminal Procedure Act, to avoid negative connotations, and clarifies that the law applies to proceedings started after it takes effect and to actions ordered after that in pending cases.

Who it affects

  • People under investigation or formally charged with a crime: They get more safeguards: a lawyer from the start, understandable information, and confidential communications with their lawyer.
  • Detained or imprisoned persons: They receive their rights in writing, can notify a family member, and must be assisted by a lawyer within three hours.
  • Minors under sixteen: They can never be held incommunicado.
  • Telecom operators and digital service companies: They must cooperate with judges and police in communications interceptions, under penalty of the crime of disobedience.
  • Judges, prosecutors, and judicial police: They must request and justify tech-based investigation measures before a judge and monitor their duration and execution.

Words worth knowing

Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal (Criminal Procedure Act)
The Spanish law that governs how criminal cases are investigated and tried.
Ley orgánica (organic law)
A special type of Spanish law, requiring stronger parliamentary majorities, used to develop fundamental rights.
Prisión incomunicada (incommunicado detention)
A regime in which the detainee cannot communicate with people outside, with limited exceptions.
Registro remoto (remote search)
A measure allowing authorities to examine, from a distance and without the owner knowing, the contents of a computer or computer system.
Agente encubierto (undercover agent)
A police officer who acts under a false identity to investigate crimes, with judicial authorization.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced13 March 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 March 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments20 March 2015Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee24 April 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary2 June 2015All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate11 June 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE1 October 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2015Apr 2015May 2015Jun 2015Jul 2015Aug 2015Sept 201511. 13 March 2015: Presentación22. 16 March 2015: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 16/03/2015 hasta 20/03/201533. 16 March 2015: Calificación44. 16 March 2015: Mesa del Congreso Calificación por el Presidente desde 16/03/2015 hasta 16/03/201555. 20 March 2015: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 20/03/2015 hasta 20/05/201566. 24 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Mesa - Calificación desde 24/04/2015 hasta 24/04/201577. 24 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Debate de totalidad desde 24/04/2015 hasta 30/04/201588. 20 May 2015: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 20/05/2015 hasta 26/05/201599. 26 May 2015: Comisión de Justicia Dictamen desde 26/05/2015 hasta 02/06/20151010. 2 June 2015: Pleno Aprobación desde 02/06/2015 hasta 11/06/20151111. 11 June 2015: Senado desde 11/06/2015 hasta 02/09/20151212. 2 September 2015: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 02/09/2015 hasta 01/10/20151313. 1 October 2015: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 01/10/2015 hasta 20/10/2015

1 October 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 184 yes · 128 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Overall vote on the Government bill for an Organic Law amending the Criminal Procedure Law for the strengthening of procedural guarantees and the regulation of technological investigation measures, due to its organic nature.

This law had 39 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 59 of sitting 289· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 40 most voted in favour; in 7, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 40
  • Against: 7
  • Tie: 5
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista108
91 against · 1 abst. · 16 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
2 in favour · 11 against · 5 did not vote
GC-CiU16
10 against · 6 did not vote
GIP11
7 against · 4 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
182 in favour · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Organic Law 13/2015, of October 5, amending the Criminal Procedure Act to strengthen procedural guarantees and regulate technological investigation measures.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.