What it is
Reform of Spain's Judiciary Law: organization, data and jurisdiction
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 27 February 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000134· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Military jurisdiction is definitively integrated into the Judiciary, and the Defense Ministry's privilege of submitting shortlists to appoint Judges of the Military Chamber of the Supreme Court is eliminated.
- A review appeal to the Supreme Court is allowed against a final judgment when the European Court of Human Rights has found it violates rights under the European Convention, provided the violation has lasting effects.
- Data protection in the courts is regulated for the first time in a complete way, distinguishing between jurisdictional files (overseen by the General Council of the Judiciary) and non-jurisdictional files (overseen by the Spanish Data Protection Agency).
- The powers of the Courts of Violence against Women are expanded to cover crimes against privacy, image and honor, and breach-of-sentence crimes when the victim is the offender's wife or partner. The Government may also extend their jurisdiction over two or more judicial districts in the same province by royal decree.
- The criteria for deciding when Spanish courts hear civil cases with international elements are updated, and the procedure for referring questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union is regulated.
- The direct civil liability of Judges and Magistrates is eliminated: those harmed must claim against the State, which may seek reimbursement from the judge in cases of willful misconduct or gross negligence. The emeritus judge figure is also abolished, and active service may be extended up to age 72.
- Judicial Secretaries are renamed Court Clerks (Letrados de la Administración de Justicia), with new duties such as mediation, handling order-for-payment procedures, and issuing 'decrees' as their own type of ruling, plus a specific disciplinary regime.
- The cassation appeal in administrative law is strengthened to ensure uniform application of the law, with an admission system based on objective cassation interest for building case law.
Who it affects
- Citizens who go to court, especially victims of gender violence, who will have more specialized judges with broader powers.: More specialization and protection.
- People whose data appears in court proceedings, whose rights of access, rectification, cancellation and objection are now regulated.: More control over their data.
- Judges, Magistrates and Court Clerks, whose rules on liability, substitutions, discipline and retirement change.: New professional rules.
- Those litigating civil cases with international elements or appealing in cassation in administrative matters.: New jurisdiction and appeal rules.
- People with disabilities, who will have a reserved minimum quota in selection processes for the judicial and prosecutorial careers and other court staff.: More access to judicial employment.
Words worth knowing
- Recurso de revisión (review appeal)
- An exceptional way to ask that a final judgment be reexamined, for example when a European court finds it violated rights.
- Cuestión prejudicial (preliminary reference)
- A question a Spanish judge sends to the Court of Justice of the European Union about how to interpret EU law.
- Recurso de casación (cassation appeal)
- An appeal to the Supreme Court to review errors in applying the law, not to retry the case.
- Ficheros jurisdiccionales (jurisdictional files)
- Sets of personal data created to handle court proceedings.
- Procedimiento monitorio (order-for-payment procedure)
- A simplified court process to claim money debts quickly.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced27 February 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 March 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments6 March 2015Groups propose changes.
- Committee13 April 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary4 May 2015All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate14 May 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE8 July 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
8 July 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, due to its organic character.
This law had 50 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 31 of sitting 278· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 3 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 21 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 12 no · 4 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and Sin grupo. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 37 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 37
- Against: 10
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 107 | 99 against · 8 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 3 against · 2 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 1 in favour · 14 against · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 15 | 12 against · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 against · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 178 in favour · 1 against · 6 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary.
Presented before in:
- VII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposición de Ley Orgánica por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 6/1985, de 1 de julio, del Poder Judicial
- VIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary.
- VIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Passed Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary.
- VIII Legislature, Senate Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 7/2015, of July 21, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000134
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 31 of sitting 278
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2015-8167
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.