Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Reform of Spain's Judiciary Law: organization, data and jurisdiction

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 27 February 2015. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000134· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. Military jurisdiction is definitively integrated into the Judiciary, and the Defense Ministry's privilege of submitting shortlists to appoint Judges of the Military Chamber of the Supreme Court is eliminated.
  2. A review appeal to the Supreme Court is allowed against a final judgment when the European Court of Human Rights has found it violates rights under the European Convention, provided the violation has lasting effects.
  3. Data protection in the courts is regulated for the first time in a complete way, distinguishing between jurisdictional files (overseen by the General Council of the Judiciary) and non-jurisdictional files (overseen by the Spanish Data Protection Agency).
  4. The powers of the Courts of Violence against Women are expanded to cover crimes against privacy, image and honor, and breach-of-sentence crimes when the victim is the offender's wife or partner. The Government may also extend their jurisdiction over two or more judicial districts in the same province by royal decree.
  5. The criteria for deciding when Spanish courts hear civil cases with international elements are updated, and the procedure for referring questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union is regulated.
  6. The direct civil liability of Judges and Magistrates is eliminated: those harmed must claim against the State, which may seek reimbursement from the judge in cases of willful misconduct or gross negligence. The emeritus judge figure is also abolished, and active service may be extended up to age 72.
  7. Judicial Secretaries are renamed Court Clerks (Letrados de la Administración de Justicia), with new duties such as mediation, handling order-for-payment procedures, and issuing 'decrees' as their own type of ruling, plus a specific disciplinary regime.
  8. The cassation appeal in administrative law is strengthened to ensure uniform application of the law, with an admission system based on objective cassation interest for building case law.

Who it affects

  • Citizens who go to court, especially victims of gender violence, who will have more specialized judges with broader powers.: More specialization and protection.
  • People whose data appears in court proceedings, whose rights of access, rectification, cancellation and objection are now regulated.: More control over their data.
  • Judges, Magistrates and Court Clerks, whose rules on liability, substitutions, discipline and retirement change.: New professional rules.
  • Those litigating civil cases with international elements or appealing in cassation in administrative matters.: New jurisdiction and appeal rules.
  • People with disabilities, who will have a reserved minimum quota in selection processes for the judicial and prosecutorial careers and other court staff.: More access to judicial employment.

Words worth knowing

Recurso de revisión (review appeal)
An exceptional way to ask that a final judgment be reexamined, for example when a European court finds it violated rights.
Cuestión prejudicial (preliminary reference)
A question a Spanish judge sends to the Court of Justice of the European Union about how to interpret EU law.
Recurso de casación (cassation appeal)
An appeal to the Supreme Court to review errors in applying the law, not to retry the case.
Ficheros jurisdiccionales (jurisdictional files)
Sets of personal data created to handle court proceedings.
Procedimiento monitorio (order-for-payment procedure)
A simplified court process to claim money debts quickly.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced27 February 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 March 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments6 March 2015Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee13 April 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary4 May 2015All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate14 May 2015The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE8 July 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2015Mar 2015Apr 2015May 2015Jun 201511. 27 February 2015: Presentación22. 3 March 2015: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 03/03/2015 hasta 06/03/201533. 3 March 2015: Calificación44. 6 March 2015: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 06/03/2015 hasta 24/04/201555. 8 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Mesa - Calificación desde 08/04/2015 hasta 13/04/201566. 13 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Debate de totalidad desde 13/04/2015 hasta 16/04/201577. 24 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 24/04/2015 hasta 28/04/201588. 28 April 2015: Comisión de Justicia Dictamen desde 28/04/2015 hasta 04/05/201599. 4 May 2015: Pleno Aprobación desde 04/05/2015 hasta 14/05/20151010. 14 May 2015: Senado desde 14/05/2015 hasta 24/06/20151111. 24 June 2015: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 24/06/2015 hasta 08/07/20151212. 8 July 2015: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 08/07/2015 hasta 08/09/2015

8 July 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 179 yes · 139 no · 5 abst.

Voted on: Overall vote on the Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, due to its organic character.

This law had 50 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 31 of sitting 278· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and Sin grupo. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 37 most voted in favour; in 10, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 37
  • Against: 10
  • Tie: 5
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista107
99 against · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
3 against · 2 did not vote
Mixto19
1 in favour · 14 against · 4 did not vote
GC-CiU15
12 against · 3 did not vote
GIP11
9 against · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 abst.
Sin grupo1
1 against
Popular en el Congreso185
178 in favour · 1 against · 6 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Presented before in:

Published in the BOE: Organic Law 7/2015, of July 21, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.