Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Government bill on urgent measures to strengthen protection for mortgage debtors (originating from Royal Decree-Law 27/2012, of 15 November).

Committee step 4 of 7 · Withdrawn

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 29 November 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000031· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is withdrawn.

  1. Introduced29 November 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted4 December 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments7 December 2012Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee24 January 2013A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 8 official steps on a timeline
Nov 2012Dec 2012Jan 2013Feb 2013Mar 201311. 29 November 2012: Presentación22. 4 December 2012: Comisión de Economía y Competitividad Publicación desde 04/12/2012 hasta 07/12/201233. 4 December 2012: Calificación44. 7 December 2012: Comisión de Economía y Competitividad Enmiendas desde 07/12/2012 hasta 09/02/201355. 2 January 2013: Comisión de Economía y Competitividad Mesa - Calificación desde 02/01/2013 hasta 24/01/201366. 24 January 2013: Comisión de Economía y Competitividad Debate de totalidad desde 24/01/2013 hasta 30/01/201377. 9 February 2013: Comisión de Economía y Competitividad Informe desde 09/02/2013 hasta 16/04/201388. 16 April 2013: Concluido- (Subsumido en otra iniciativa) desde 16/04/2013 hasta 23/04/2013

30 January 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 153 yes · 174 no

Voted on: Requests by the Parliamentary Groups of Union, Progress and Democracy and Socialist for the Plenary to take up the Government bill on urgent measures to strengthen the protection of mortgage debtors (originating from Royal Decree-Law 27/2012, of 15 November).

This law had 4 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 81· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 36, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 36
  • Tie: 5
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
102 in favour · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
15 in favour · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
15 in favour · 1 did not vote
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
174 against · 11 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

Whoever introduced it withdrew it, or it was merged into another one. It goes no further.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.