What it is
New court fees and toxicology registry fees
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 3 August 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill regulating certain fees in the sphere of the Administration of Justice and the National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000018· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The law creates a state fee for going to court in civil, administrative litigation and social (labor) proceedings. It applies to filing lawsuits, counterclaims, payment order requests, insolvency filings and certain appeals, but not to criminal cases.
- The fee has a fixed part depending on the type of case (for example, 300 euros for an ordinary civil trial or 1,200 euros for cassation appeals) plus a variable part of 0.5% or 0.25% based on the amount in dispute.
- People with legal aid, the State Attorney General's Office (Ministerio Fiscal), public administrations and the Spanish Parliament are exempt, among others. There are also exemptions for family and minor-related cases, and workers get a 60% exemption on appeals in social proceedings.
- The person paying must attach the payment receipt to the court filing; otherwise the court clerk will not process it until it is corrected. If the amount in dispute changes, a supplementary return must be filed within one month.
- 60% of the fee is refunded if the dispute ends in an out-of-court settlement, 20% if cases are joined, and there is a 10% discount for using electronic means.
- A second fee is created for companies registering or updating toxicology records with the Toxicological Information Service, with reduced amounts for SMEs and a temporary exemption for companies that belonged to certain trade associations.
Who it affects
- People filing lawsuits or appeals in civil, administrative or social proceedings: They must pay the court fee before filing, unless exempt.
- People with legal aid, the State Attorney General's Office and public administrations: They are exempt from the fee.
- Workers in social (labor) proceedings: They get a 60% exemption on appeals.
- Companies selling hazardous chemical mixtures: They must pay the toxicology registry fee, with reduced amounts if they are SMEs.
- Public employees in the justice administration: The 2012 cut to their extra pay is adjusted to match that of other civil servants.
Words worth knowing
- Tasa
- A fee paid to the State for a specific public service, such as going to court.
- Hecho imponible
- The action or situation that triggers the tax, such as filing a lawsuit.
- Sujeto pasivo
- The person required to pay the fee.
- Devengo
- The moment the obligation to pay the fee arises.
- Autoliquidación
- A tax return the taxpayer fills out and pays themselves, without the administration calculating it.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced3 August 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 September 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments7 September 2012Groups propose changes.
- Committee16 October 2012A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate31 October 2012The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE14 November 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
22 October 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Request by the Socialist Parliamentary Group for the Plenary to take up the Government bill regulating certain fees in the field of the Administration of Justice and the National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 62· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 13 yes · 6 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid Tie 15 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 5 most voted in favour; in 40, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 5
- Against: 40
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 90 in favour · 1 against · 19 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Mixto | 18 | 8 in favour · 1 against · 9 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 8 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 175 against · 10 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Government bill regulating certain fees in the sphere of the Administration of Justice and the National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences.
Published in the BOE: Law 10/2012, of November 20, regulating certain fees in the field of the Administration of Justice and the National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000018
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 62
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2012-14301
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.