What it is
More time and more control for regional and local funding aid
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 20 July 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 2/2012, of April 27, on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000016· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The deadlines for the extraordinary liquidity mechanisms (urgent State money) can be extended by decision of the Commission Delegated for Economic Affairs of the Government, if regions or local governments have trouble accessing financial markets.
- Autonomous communities using these mechanisms must send information to the Ministry of Finance monthly instead of quarterly, including data on their treasury plan, compliance with their adjustment plan, and any deviations.
- All Public Administrations must have treasury plans showing they can pay their debts. If the Government sees a risk of non-payment, it is considered to seriously harm the general interest and the measures in Article 26 of the previous law apply.
- The increase in central government debt from financing these mechanisms is counted toward the regions and local governments that receive the money, in the amount they received.
Who it affects
- Autonomous communities that access the funding mechanisms: They must sign an adjustment plan, send monthly information, and accept controls if they request liquidity aid from the State.
- Local corporations (municipal councils and other local entities): They must submit comptroller reports on the execution of adjustment plans, annually or quarterly depending on the case.
- All Public Administrations: They must have treasury plans showing their ability to pay debt maturities.
- Government and Ministry of Finance and Public Administrations: It can extend the deadlines for the mechanisms, monitor adjustment plans, and declare a risk of non-payment.
Words worth knowing
- Liquidez (liquidity)
- Money available in the short term to pay what is owed.
- Plan de ajuste (adjustment plan)
- A set of spending cuts and controls the administration must follow to receive the aid.
- Plan de tesorería (treasury plan)
- A forecast of income and payments that shows whether there will be money to cover debts.
- Comisión Delegada del Gobierno para Asuntos Económicos
- A Government body that makes decisions on economic matters.
- Interventor (comptroller)
- A public official who checks that an administration's income and spending follow the rules.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced20 July 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted24 July 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments27 July 2012Groups propose changes.
- Committee4 September 2012A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary11 September 2012All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate13 September 2012The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE26 September 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
13 September 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the text of the Government bill to be processed in a single reading and having an organic character.
This law had 23 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 32 of sitting 53· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 19 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 39 most voted in favour; in 5, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 39
- Against: 5
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 1 in favour · 93 against · 1 abst. · 15 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Mixto | 18 | 2 in favour · 6 against · 1 abst. · 9 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 14 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 10 against · 1 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 179 in favour · 1 against · 5 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Organic Government bill amending Organic Law 2/2012, of April 27, on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 4/2012, of September 28, amending Organic Law 2/2012, of April 27, on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000016
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 32 of sitting 53
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2012-12192
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.