What it is
More flexibility for regional public television in Spain
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 21 April 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill amending Law 7/2010, of 31 March, General Law on Audiovisual Communication, to flexibilize the management modes of autonomous community public audiovisual communication services.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000009· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Regional Governments (Comunidades Autónomas) will be able to choose how to provide the public television service: direct management, indirect management, public-private collaboration, or even stop providing it and hold contests to award licenses to private companies. They may also transfer the service to a third party.
- Regional public broadcasters may sign agreements with each other, or with the RTVE Corporation, to jointly produce or edit content and improve efficiency.
- The rule that barred public broadcasters from holding shares in private television companies is relaxed: Regional Governments may now hold shares in the provider of their own public service if they manage it indirectly.
- Regional public broadcasters will face new spending controls: an annual spending cap that cannot be exceeded, an annual report due before April 1, and oversight systems including operational audits. These rules do not apply to RTVE, which has its own law.
Who it affects
- Regional Governments (Comunidades Autónomas): They can decide how to manage or stop providing their public television, and must control its spending.
- Regional public broadcasters: They must meet spending caps, file annual reports and undergo audits.
- Private audiovisual media companies: They can receive licenses through contests or run the public service in collaboration with public authorities.
- Viewers and families: Rules protecting minors remain in place, with time slots and parental controls.
Words worth knowing
- Gestión indirecta (indirect management)
- The service is provided by a company or entity other than the government itself.
- Licencia audiovisual (audiovisual license)
- Official authorization to broadcast television, granted through a contest.
- Auditoría operativa (operational audit)
- An independent, detailed review of how an entity is run, to check whether it is managed sensibly and find flaws.
- Haciendas Forales (Foral treasuries)
- The special funding systems of Navarre and the Basque Country, governed by their agreements with the State.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced21 April 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted24 April 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments27 April 2012Groups propose changes.
- Committee21 May 2012A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate7 June 2012The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE24 July 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
24 July 2012
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendment to the Sole Article, One, of suppression of the third paragraph of Section 2 of Article 7 of Law 7/2010.
This law had 4 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 50· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 15 yes · 8 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 9 no · 3 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 10 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of GC-CiU, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 42 most voted in favour; in 4, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 42
- Against: 4
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 103 against · 7 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 18 | 2 in favour · 4 against · 12 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 8 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 173 in favour · 12 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- X Legislature, Senate Government bill amending Law 7/2010, of 31 March, General Law on Audiovisual Communication, to flexibilize the management modes of autonomous community public audiovisual communication services.
Published in the BOE: Law 6/2012, of August 1, amending Law 7/2010, of March 31, General Law on Audiovisual Communication, to flexibilize the management modes of autonomous public audiovisual communication services.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000009
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 50
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2012-10385
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.